Effects of conventional and ridge planting methods at different plant densities on yield and yield components in chickpea

Objective: This study was carried out to determine the applicability of the ridge sowing method and the appropriate sowing density for chickpeas on existing ridges after cotton under rain-dependent conditions. Material and Methods: The trials were carried out at split randomized block design with three replications. Two planting methods (ridge planting and conventional planting), and five planting density (30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 seed per square meter) were discussed as application issues. Results: It was determined that ridge planting method was better than conventional planting method in terms of investigated characters as days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height, first pod height, primary branches plant-1 and anthracnose disease value in the study. It was seen that seed yields were affected less from environmental climate changes for ridge planting method, and anthracnose disease value occurred at lower ratio compared to conventional planting. It was determined that the convenient planting density of chickpea was 40 seed per square meter for conventional planting and 45 seed for ridge planting in the economic analysis. Conclusion: The average yield of the conventional planting method after cotton using the appropriate planting density (2081.7 kg ha-1) was found to be 6.2% higher than the yield of the ridge planting method (1960.0 kg ha-1). However, in the economic analysis, it was determined that ridge planting was 9.2% more profitable than the conventional planting method in terms of net income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1491122
Primary Topic
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of conventional and ridge planting methods at different plant densities on yield and yield components in chickpea

İrfan Erdemci, Medeni Yaşar, Murat Koç
Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
article

Effects of conventional and ridge planting methods at different plant densities on yield and yield components in chickpea

İrfan Erdemci, Medeni Yaşar, Murat Koç
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study was carried out to determine the applicability of the ridge sowing method and the appropriate sowing density for chickpeas on existing ridges after cotton under rain-dependent conditions. Material and Methods: The trials were carried out at split randomized block design with three replications. Two planting methods (ridge planting and conventional planting), and five planting density (30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 seed per square meter) were discussed as application issues. Results: It was determined that ridge planting method was better than conventional planting method in terms of investigated characters as days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height, first pod height, primary branches plant-1 and anthracnose disease value in the study. It was seen that seed yields were affected less from environmental climate changes for ridge planting method, and anthracnose disease value occurred at lower ratio compared to conventional planting. It was determined that the convenient planting density of chickpea was 40 seed per square meter for conventional planting and 45 seed for ridge planting in the economic analysis. Conclusion: The average yield of the conventional planting method after cotton using the appropriate planting density (2081.7 kg ha-1) was found to be 6.2% higher than the yield of the ridge planting method (1960.0 kg ha-1). However, in the economic analysis, it was determined that ridge planting was 9.2% more profitable than the conventional planting method in terms of net income.

Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi DergisiVol. 62(1)
Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.