An evaluation method for heterogeneous flexible resource regulation capability from demand side of distribution networks

With the increasing penetration rate of renewable energy, the difficulty of matching supply and demand in distribution networks also increases. It is necessary to fully explore the regulatory potential of flexible resources on the user side. To assess the regulatory capacity of multiple types of flexible resources on the user side of distribution networks, first, a regulatory capacity assessment framework for distribution network flexible resource clusters is proposed, which includes two levels: node level and system level. Secondly, based on the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) model, response models for user-side flexible resources such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), electric vehicles (EVs), and energy storage system (ESS) are established, obtaining node-level flexible resource adjustable capacity indicators. Then, we take the minimum daily system load peak-to-valley difference and the maximum daily renewable energy absorption as the objective functions, and comprehensively considering the operational constraints of the distribution network and the regulatory constraints of flexible resources, a system-level flexible resource adjustable capacity assessment model is established. Finally, a case study was conducted in the Portugal 54-node system, and the results show that the proposed method can effectively quantify and evaluate the regulatory capacity of multiple types of flexible resource clusters in distribution networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.0718
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation method for heterogeneous flexible resource regulation capability from demand side of distribution networks

Jiani Zhou, Yuhao Zhang, Xiaochen Sun, Heng Cui et al.
1 links
IET conference proceedings.
Power Systems and Technologies
article

An evaluation method for heterogeneous flexible resource regulation capability from demand side of distribution networks

Jiani Zhou, Yuhao Zhang, Xiaochen Sun, Heng Cui, Jinfeng Wang
article en

Abstract

With the increasing penetration rate of renewable energy, the difficulty of matching supply and demand in distribution networks also increases. It is necessary to fully explore the regulatory potential of flexible resources on the user side. To assess the regulatory capacity of multiple types of flexible resources on the user side of distribution networks, first, a regulatory capacity assessment framework for distribution network flexible resource clusters is proposed, which includes two levels: node level and system level. Secondly, based on the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) model, response models for user-side flexible resources such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), electric vehicles (EVs), and energy storage system (ESS) are established, obtaining node-level flexible resource adjustable capacity indicators. Then, we take the minimum daily system load peak-to-valley difference and the maximum daily renewable energy absorption as the objective functions, and comprehensively considering the operational constraints of the distribution network and the regulatory constraints of flexible resources, a system-level flexible resource adjustable capacity assessment model is established. Finally, a case study was conducted in the Portugal 54-node system, and the results show that the proposed method can effectively quantify and evaluate the regulatory capacity of multiple types of flexible resource clusters in distribution networks.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2024(33)
Southeast University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Power Systems and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.