Trends and trajectories in “Global South” research: a comparative study of CNKI and WOS database publications

Objectives This study analyzes the development of research on the “Global South” through bibliometric analysis with CiteSpace software, drawing on literature from both Chinese scholars using the CNKI database and international scholars from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Methods The study employs bibliometric analysis with CiteSpace software and content analysis to compare the research focuses, perspectives, and ideas on the “Global South” between Chinese and international scholars. Results The study finds that both Chinese and international scholars view the “Global South” as a complex and evolving concept. However, Chinese scholars focus on understanding and applying the concept in the context of China’s evolving role in international politics, while international scholars explore the concept across various fields through case studies. Conclusion The study calls for an integrated interdisciplinary discussion combining political science, economics, sociology, and cultural studies to better understand the complexity and diversity of the “Global South.” It also highlights the importance of academic collaboration between Chinese and international scholars to achieve a global consensus and suggests expanding case studies for policy implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1527881
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends and trajectories in “Global South” research: a comparative study of CNKI and WOS database publications

Sity Daud, Jiangwei Liu
Frontiers in Political Science
International Development and Aid
article

Trends and trajectories in “Global South” research: a comparative study of CNKI and WOS database publications

Sity Daud, Jiangwei Liu
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study analyzes the development of research on the “Global South” through bibliometric analysis with CiteSpace software, drawing on literature from both Chinese scholars using the CNKI database and international scholars from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Methods The study employs bibliometric analysis with CiteSpace software and content analysis to compare the research focuses, perspectives, and ideas on the “Global South” between Chinese and international scholars. Results The study finds that both Chinese and international scholars view the “Global South” as a complex and evolving concept. However, Chinese scholars focus on understanding and applying the concept in the context of China’s evolving role in international politics, while international scholars explore the concept across various fields through case studies. Conclusion The study calls for an integrated interdisciplinary discussion combining political science, economics, sociology, and cultural studies to better understand the complexity and diversity of the “Global South.” It also highlights the importance of academic collaboration between Chinese and international scholars to achieve a global consensus and suggests expanding case studies for policy implementation.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
China Three Gorges University (CN), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trends and trajectories in “Global South” research: a comparative study of CNKI and WOS database publications — Sity Daud, Jiangwei Liu · Frontiers in Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS