The problems with the nature of the obligation in Article 66.2 of TRIPS

Abstract The paper argues that Article 66.2 of the Trade‐Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Agreement (TRIPS)—which mandates developed countries to provide incentives to their enterprises and institutions to facilitate technology transfer to Least Developed Countries (LDCs)—as presently framed, is unlikely to help LDCs build a viable technological base. Examining the history and motivations for the inclusion of Article 66.2 in TRIPS and examining its framing, the paper argues that because the process that led to its inclusion was ad hoc, the construction of the provision is riddled with ambiguities that make its implementation difficult for both developed countries and LDCs. The paper also notes that the subsequent lack of interpretative guidance and enforceability through the World Trade Organization's dispute settlement system further exacerbates the conceptual failures in the provision and limits its usefulness for LDCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of World Intellectual Property
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12354
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The problems with the nature of the obligation in Article 66.2 of TRIPS

Opeyemi I Kolawole
The Journal of World Intellectual Property
World Trade Organization Law
article

The problems with the nature of the obligation in Article 66.2 of TRIPS

Opeyemi I Kolawole
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper argues that Article 66.2 of the Trade‐Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Agreement (TRIPS)—which mandates developed countries to provide incentives to their enterprises and institutions to facilitate technology transfer to Least Developed Countries (LDCs)—as presently framed, is unlikely to help LDCs build a viable technological base. Examining the history and motivations for the inclusion of Article 66.2 in TRIPS and examining its framing, the paper argues that because the process that led to its inclusion was ad hoc, the construction of the provision is riddled with ambiguities that make its implementation difficult for both developed countries and LDCs. The paper also notes that the subsequent lack of interpretative guidance and enforceability through the World Trade Organization's dispute settlement system further exacerbates the conceptual failures in the provision and limits its usefulness for LDCs.

The Journal of World Intellectual PropertyVol. 28(3)
University College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.