Artificial Rusticalization of Ukraine in the Russian Empire and Its Interpretation in Literary Works

The article examines the phenomenon of artificial rusticalization of Ukraine as one of the key instruments of the imperial policy of the Russian Empire. This policy was aimed at forming the image of Ukraine as a rural and culturally "backward" province, reducing its rich cultural heritage to simplified and archaic "rural" forms. Such an approach allowed the empire to legitimize Russia's dominance in the region, while at the same time diminishing or completely eliminating the importance of Ukrainian culture. At the same time, Russia has been looting Ukrainian culture for centuries, appropriating its gains along with the very artists it proclaimed to be Russian (a typical example here is Mykola Gogol). The imperial myth of Russia has always been based on the deception and Russification of the peoples that were included in the Russian Empire. The author analyzes the role of fiction as a source of criticism of imperial narratives and a platform for preserving and broadcasting Ukrainian national identity. The focus of the research is debunking the myth of rural provincialism of Ukraine. The work emphasizes that the imperial policy of rustication not only distorted the perception of Ukraine outside the empire, however also formed stereotypes among the local population, influencing social psychology. At the same time, literature, like art in general, became a tool for countering this narrative, contributing to the preservation and development of national self-awareness. It was concluded that the phenomenon of rusticalization of Ukraine had not only a historical and cultural, but also a deep political and ideological dimension. The author emphasizes the importance of rethinking this phenomenon for modern society, because the issue of national identity remains relevant in the context of Ukraine's struggle to preserve its identity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IVAN OHIIENKO AND CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE AND EDUCATION SCHOLARLY PAPERS PHILOLOGY
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32626/2309-7086.2024-21.183-193
Primary Topic
Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Rusticalization of Ukraine in the Russian Empire and Its Interpretation in Literary Works

Maria Chikarkova
IVAN OHIIENKO AND CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE AND EDUCATION SCHOLARLY PAPERS PHILOLOGY
Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies
article

Artificial Rusticalization of Ukraine in the Russian Empire and Its Interpretation in Literary Works

Maria Chikarkova
article en

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of artificial rusticalization of Ukraine as one of the key instruments of the imperial policy of the Russian Empire. This policy was aimed at forming the image of Ukraine as a rural and culturally "backward" province, reducing its rich cultural heritage to simplified and archaic "rural" forms. Such an approach allowed the empire to legitimize Russia's dominance in the region, while at the same time diminishing or completely eliminating the importance of Ukrainian culture. At the same time, Russia has been looting Ukrainian culture for centuries, appropriating its gains along with the very artists it proclaimed to be Russian (a typical example here is Mykola Gogol). The imperial myth of Russia has always been based on the deception and Russification of the peoples that were included in the Russian Empire. The author analyzes the role of fiction as a source of criticism of imperial narratives and a platform for preserving and broadcasting Ukrainian national identity. The focus of the research is debunking the myth of rural provincialism of Ukraine. The work emphasizes that the imperial policy of rustication not only distorted the perception of Ukraine outside the empire, however also formed stereotypes among the local population, influencing social psychology. At the same time, literature, like art in general, became a tool for countering this narrative, contributing to the preservation and development of national self-awareness. It was concluded that the phenomenon of rusticalization of Ukraine had not only a historical and cultural, but also a deep political and ideological dimension. The author emphasizes the importance of rethinking this phenomenon for modern society, because the issue of national identity remains relevant in the context of Ukraine's struggle to preserve its identity.

IVAN OHIIENKO AND CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE AND EDUCATION SCHOLARLY PAPERS PHILOLOGYVol. 21
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.