Weighting for Equity: The Impact and Challenges of Weighted Student Funding Implementation

This mixed-methods study examines the impact and implementation of Nevada’s weighted student funding (WSF) model that targets funding to students with the greatest need. We use event study models to analyze student achievement data from 2017–2018 to 2021–2022 and qualitative in-depth interviews with school district and school administrators to explore perceptions of the new funding model. Our quantitative findings suggest that Nevada’s WSF helped improve student achievement overall, but it did not mitigate achievement disparities between targeted and non-targeted students. Our qualitative data reveal administrators’ implementation concerns, especially in designing programming to support students intending to benefit from the additional funds. Our findings highlight the tension between WSF’s two distinguishing features—targeted funding based on student needs and school administrator autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241313470
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighting for Equity: The Impact and Challenges of Weighted Student Funding Implementation

Bradley D. Marianno, Mark L. Spinrad, Megan R. Griffard
2 citations
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Higher Education Research Studies
17.85
article

Weighting for Equity: The Impact and Challenges of Weighted Student Funding Implementation

Bradley D. Marianno, Mark L. Spinrad, Megan R. Griffard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examines the impact and implementation of Nevada’s weighted student funding (WSF) model that targets funding to students with the greatest need. We use event study models to analyze student achievement data from 2017–2018 to 2021–2022 and qualitative in-depth interviews with school district and school administrators to explore perceptions of the new funding model. Our quantitative findings suggest that Nevada’s WSF helped improve student achievement overall, but it did not mitigate achievement disparities between targeted and non-targeted students. Our qualitative data reveal administrators’ implementation concerns, especially in designing programming to support students intending to benefit from the additional funds. Our findings highlight the tension between WSF’s two distinguishing features—targeted funding based on student needs and school administrator autonomy.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Research Studies
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.