Cost Model for the Footprint Planning of Production Environments in Lithium‐Ion Battery Production

The growing demand for lithium‐ion batteries necessitates detailed cost models to assess the production costs and enhance the economic viability of battery‐powered applications. In light of the energy‐consuming production environments, accurate footprint calculation enables the uncovering of inefficiencies, contributing to minimizing the environmental and economic impacts. This work presents a footprint modeling approach for a large‐scale lithium‐ion battery production. An existing cost model is extended to incorporate a process‐based footprint calculation. The model includes data from expert interviews and supplier quotations, covering parameters for dry rooms operating at varying dew points, clean rooms, and inert gas microenvironments. This allows for a comprehensive calculation of the full costs and the energy consumption associated with different production environments. A case study shows that high‐capacity cathode active materials like NMC811 can reduce overall cell costs despite requiring a more stringent moisture control in production. The study reveals that the dry room is the primary energy consumer and that utilizing inert gas microenvironments can lower the energy consumption, although accompanied by higher full costs. Moreover, an impact analysis of the buffer storage sizes and energy prices indicates minor effects on the full costs of the cells but significant operational savings for the cell manufacturer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Technology
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202402311
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost Model for the Footprint Planning of Production Environments in Lithium‐Ion Battery Production

Rüdiger Daub, Anna Kollenda, Josef Keilhofer, Maximilian Lechner et al.
2 citations
Energy Technology
Extraction and Separation Processes
1.43
article

Cost Model for the Footprint Planning of Production Environments in Lithium‐Ion Battery Production

Rüdiger Daub, Anna Kollenda, Josef Keilhofer, Maximilian Lechner, Felix Nanz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for lithium‐ion batteries necessitates detailed cost models to assess the production costs and enhance the economic viability of battery‐powered applications. In light of the energy‐consuming production environments, accurate footprint calculation enables the uncovering of inefficiencies, contributing to minimizing the environmental and economic impacts. This work presents a footprint modeling approach for a large‐scale lithium‐ion battery production. An existing cost model is extended to incorporate a process‐based footprint calculation. The model includes data from expert interviews and supplier quotations, covering parameters for dry rooms operating at varying dew points, clean rooms, and inert gas microenvironments. This allows for a comprehensive calculation of the full costs and the energy consumption associated with different production environments. A case study shows that high‐capacity cathode active materials like NMC811 can reduce overall cell costs despite requiring a more stringent moisture control in production. The study reveals that the dry room is the primary energy consumer and that utilizing inert gas microenvironments can lower the energy consumption, although accompanied by higher full costs. Moreover, an impact analysis of the buffer storage sizes and energy prices indicates minor effects on the full costs of the cells but significant operational savings for the cell manufacturer.

Energy TechnologyVol. 13(8)
Fraunhofer Institute for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Extraction and Separation Processes
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost Model for the Footprint Planning of Production Environments in Lithium‐Ion Battery Production — Rüdiger Daub, Anna Kollenda, et al. · Energy Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS