Movement‐integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk–reward trade‐off

Abstract Anthropogenic linear features often alter wildlife behaviour and movement. Landscape features, such as habitat, can have important mediating effects on wildlife response to disturbance and yet are rarely explicitly considered in how habitat and disturbance interact. We tested the movement and space‐use responses of GPS‐collared grey wolves to linear features with respect to adjacent habitat variation. We simultaneously modelled wolf movement and selection within a conditional logistic regression framework (integrated Step Selection Analysis). We explicitly considered how adjacent habitat alters these responses through putative effects, such as movement friction. Classifying linear features based on the selection and movement response of wolves revealed that pairing transmission lines and primary roads increased the avoidance response to be greater than either feature on its own and provided evidence of a semi‐permeable barrier to movement. In contrast, features with reduced human activity, including secondary and tertiary roads, were highly selected for and may function as movement corridors. Synthesis and applications . Explicitly parameterizing adjacent habitat provides evidence that where a linear feature is routed and which habitats it interacts with will have the greatest implications for wolf behavioural responses. Reduced avoidance behaviour in highly risky environments signifies the importance of habitat for maintaining landscape connectivity, particularly when routing multiple different features parallel and near each other. Increased vegetation density along linear features also reduces movement advantages putatively by increasing friction, indicating that actively decommissioning other features, such as secondary roads, could be an effective mitigation strategy for reducing wolf encounters with prey. Knowing the influence of adjacent habitats on the likelihood of wolves selecting for a given linear feature creates context to minimize the impact of new anthropogenic features on behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70031
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Movement‐integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk–reward trade‐off

Julie W. Turner, Katrien A. Kingdon, Eric Vander Wal, Jonathan P. Wiens et al.
3 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
article

Movement‐integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk–reward trade‐off

Julie W. Turner, Katrien A. Kingdon, Eric Vander Wal, Jonathan P. Wiens, Vanessa B. Harriman, Christina M. Prokopenko, Daniel L. J. Dupont, Alec L. Robitaille
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Anthropogenic linear features often alter wildlife behaviour and movement. Landscape features, such as habitat, can have important mediating effects on wildlife response to disturbance and yet are rarely explicitly considered in how habitat and disturbance interact. We tested the movement and space‐use responses of GPS‐collared grey wolves to linear features with respect to adjacent habitat variation. We simultaneously modelled wolf movement and selection within a conditional logistic regression framework (integrated Step Selection Analysis). We explicitly considered how adjacent habitat alters these responses through putative effects, such as movement friction. Classifying linear features based on the selection and movement response of wolves revealed that pairing transmission lines and primary roads increased the avoidance response to be greater than either feature on its own and provided evidence of a semi‐permeable barrier to movement. In contrast, features with reduced human activity, including secondary and tertiary roads, were highly selected for and may function as movement corridors. Synthesis and applications . Explicitly parameterizing adjacent habitat provides evidence that where a linear feature is routed and which habitats it interacts with will have the greatest implications for wolf behavioural responses. Reduced avoidance behaviour in highly risky environments signifies the importance of habitat for maintaining landscape connectivity, particularly when routing multiple different features parallel and near each other. Increased vegetation density along linear features also reduces movement advantages putatively by increasing friction, indicating that actively decommissioning other features, such as secondary roads, could be an effective mitigation strategy for reducing wolf encounters with prey. Knowing the influence of adjacent habitats on the likelihood of wolves selecting for a given linear feature creates context to minimize the impact of new anthropogenic features on behaviour.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(5)
Ducks Unlimited Canada (CA), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Manitoba Hydro (CA), Université de Saint-Boniface (CA)
Newfoundland and Labrador, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.