Reliability and criterion validity of the Turkish version of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire

Background: This study aims to determine reliability and criterion validity of the Turkish version of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ). Materials and methods: The study included 146 individuals aged 18–45 years. Translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was performed with regard to an appropriate procedure. Test–retest reliability was analyzed in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For assessment of validity of the questionnaire, the criterion validity method was used. Criterion validity was evaluated using a pedometer, which is an objective measurement tool. The correlation between the total number of steps recorded during a week and RPAQ scores was examined. The validity was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The ICC value was 0.96 for total PAEE (physical activity energy expenditure) and between 0.77 and 0.97 for home, work, recreation, and transportation PAEE. The duration of intensity levels varied between 0.80 and 0.97. Test–retest reliability of RPAQ was high. A moderate correlation (r = 0.472) was found between the total value of RPAQ and the number of steps, and a weak-to-moderate correlation (r = 0.210–0.442) was found for other dimensions. No correlation was found with home activities. Conclusion: The Turkish version of RPAQ is valid and reliable. RPAQ can be used to assess the physical activity level of the Turkish population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.17.1.03
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and criterion validity of the Turkish version of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire

Nevin Atalay Güzel, Sinem Suner-Keklik, Kübra Ayşe Daşdemir, Gamze Çobanoğlu
1 links
Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Reliability and criterion validity of the Turkish version of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire

Nevin Atalay Güzel, Sinem Suner-Keklik, Kübra Ayşe Daşdemir, Gamze Çobanoğlu
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aims to determine reliability and criterion validity of the Turkish version of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ). Materials and methods: The study included 146 individuals aged 18–45 years. Translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was performed with regard to an appropriate procedure. Test–retest reliability was analyzed in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For assessment of validity of the questionnaire, the criterion validity method was used. Criterion validity was evaluated using a pedometer, which is an objective measurement tool. The correlation between the total number of steps recorded during a week and RPAQ scores was examined. The validity was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The ICC value was 0.96 for total PAEE (physical activity energy expenditure) and between 0.77 and 0.97 for home, work, recreation, and transportation PAEE. The duration of intensity levels varied between 0.80 and 0.97. Test–retest reliability of RPAQ was high. A moderate correlation (r = 0.472) was found between the total value of RPAQ and the number of steps, and a weak-to-moderate correlation (r = 0.210–0.442) was found for other dimensions. No correlation was found with home activities. Conclusion: The Turkish version of RPAQ is valid and reliable. RPAQ can be used to assess the physical activity level of the Turkish population.

Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.