Prediction of 14-day hospitalization risk in chronic heart failure patients, using interpretable machine learning methods

Abstract Purpose We wished to investigate whether the risk of acute hospitalizations of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients, could be predicted from biweekly measurements of pulse, blood pressure and weight. We emphasized machine learning models with a high degree of interpretability, due to low adaptation of complex machine learning models in clinical practice. Methods Using 11,575 measurements of pulse, blood pressure and weight belonging to 122 patients, we trained three types of machine learning algorithms, logistic regression, Random Forest and “RuleFit” to predict nonelective hospitalization within the next 14 days. We used a fivefold cross validation framework to estimate performance metrics, including f-measure, “Receiver Operating Characteristic—Area Under the Curve” (ROC-AUC), sensitivity and specificity. Results A simple interpretable machine learning algorithm, logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso), performed the best. The regression based on simple features performed with a ROC-AUC of 0.622 (sensitivity = 0.185, specificity = 0.93), while the regression based on a more complex feature set performed with a ROC-AUC of 0.657 (sensitivity = 0.212, specificity = 0.921). Conclusion In our study simple interpretable methods, outperformed more complex black box machine learning methods in predicting hospitalization of heart failure patients. This suggests that interpretable methods are appropriate in this context. However, the strength of results are slightly limited by the overall modest performance of the models and the small sample size. Clinical Trial Registration The original trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identification number NCT02860013 at the 9th of august, 2016.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Technology
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-025-00957-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of 14-day hospitalization risk in chronic heart failure patients, using interpretable machine learning methods

Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen, Alexander Arndt Pasgaard Xylander, Ole Hejlesen, Flemming Witt Udsen et al.
1 citations
Health and Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
article

Prediction of 14-day hospitalization risk in chronic heart failure patients, using interpretable machine learning methods

Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen, Alexander Arndt Pasgaard Xylander, Ole Hejlesen, Flemming Witt Udsen, Simon Lebech Cichosz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose We wished to investigate whether the risk of acute hospitalizations of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients, could be predicted from biweekly measurements of pulse, blood pressure and weight. We emphasized machine learning models with a high degree of interpretability, due to low adaptation of complex machine learning models in clinical practice. Methods Using 11,575 measurements of pulse, blood pressure and weight belonging to 122 patients, we trained three types of machine learning algorithms, logistic regression, Random Forest and “RuleFit” to predict nonelective hospitalization within the next 14 days. We used a fivefold cross validation framework to estimate performance metrics, including f-measure, “Receiver Operating Characteristic—Area Under the Curve” (ROC-AUC), sensitivity and specificity. Results A simple interpretable machine learning algorithm, logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso), performed the best. The regression based on simple features performed with a ROC-AUC of 0.622 (sensitivity = 0.185, specificity = 0.93), while the regression based on a more complex feature set performed with a ROC-AUC of 0.657 (sensitivity = 0.212, specificity = 0.921). Conclusion In our study simple interpretable methods, outperformed more complex black box machine learning methods in predicting hospitalization of heart failure patients. This suggests that interpretable methods are appropriate in this context. However, the strength of results are slightly limited by the overall modest performance of the models and the small sample size. Clinical Trial Registration The original trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identification number NCT02860013 at the 9th of august, 2016.

Health and TechnologyVol. 15(3)
Aalborg University (DK)
Aalborg Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.