Constellations of Atypical Employment in Couples and Labour Income: Where is Disadvantage Located?

This article investigates the implications of atypical employment in couples for labour income. It develops differentiated hypotheses on consequences of atypical employment for couple income by integrating theories on labour market segmentation and partner effects on labour market outcomes. Longitudinal data from Germany (1995–2018) is used to run fixed-effects models. Couples with one partner in temporary employment do not experience income disadvantages relative to dual-permanent couples, but some disadvantage is observed for dual-temporary couples. When one or both partners work part-time, absolute joint labour income is significantly lower, but net of working hours no significant differences remain in most cases. The exception is dual part-time couples with at least one partner in marginal part-time work, who face large absolute and full-time equivalized income disadvantages. Analyses also indicate that the male partner being atypically employed affects labour income more negatively than the female partner being atypically employed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work Employment and Society
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170251317435
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constellations of Atypical Employment in Couples and Labour Income: Where is Disadvantage Located?

Leonie Westhoff
Work Employment and Society
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Constellations of Atypical Employment in Couples and Labour Income: Where is Disadvantage Located?

Leonie Westhoff
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the implications of atypical employment in couples for labour income. It develops differentiated hypotheses on consequences of atypical employment for couple income by integrating theories on labour market segmentation and partner effects on labour market outcomes. Longitudinal data from Germany (1995–2018) is used to run fixed-effects models. Couples with one partner in temporary employment do not experience income disadvantages relative to dual-permanent couples, but some disadvantage is observed for dual-temporary couples. When one or both partners work part-time, absolute joint labour income is significantly lower, but net of working hours no significant differences remain in most cases. The exception is dual part-time couples with at least one partner in marginal part-time work, who face large absolute and full-time equivalized income disadvantages. Analyses also indicate that the male partner being atypically employed affects labour income more negatively than the female partner being atypically employed.

Work Employment and SocietyVol. 39(4)
University of Oxford (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Clarendon Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constellations of Atypical Employment in Couples and Labour Income: Where is Disadvantage Located? — Leonie Westhoff · Work Employment and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS