Local perspectives, regional consequences: The socio-environmental impacts of sand harvesting in southern Africa

• A suite of socio-environmental issues in both licensed and unlicensed operations were identified. • Experienced impacts and benefits strongly depended on geography and the type of mining activity. • Inadequate governance, monitoring, policing, and rehabilitation remain the main obstacles. • Knowledge gaps exist on mining extents, replenishment rates and effectiveness of rehabilitation. After water, sand is the most exploited resource on Earth, with extraction rates often exceeding the sustainable supply, impacting ecosystems and local communities. Still, there is very little information on the situation in southern Africa, despite the rapid economic growth in the region and associated increase in sand demand. This study aimed to address this gap by identifying the implications of sand extraction on local communities and the ecosystem, drawing upon the perspectives of local stakeholders. Qualitative data collected in Botswana, South Africa and Mozambique through stakeholder interviews, revealed a suite of environmental and social issues surrounding both licensed and unlicensed operations. The experienced negative impacts and benefits were occasionally contradictory in nature, strongly depending on characteristics relating to geography, and the type of sand harvesting activity. We subsequently explored links between experienced benefits, impacts and current regulatory frameworks through development of a Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, which highlighted that careful mining site selection and adherence to regulations could minimise socio-environmental impacts whilst achieving benefits. The findings of the study provided insights on the main obstacles for alleviating sand harvesting-related impacts and existing knowledge gaps that need to be first addressed to inform the development of more sustainable sand harvesting practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Extractive Industries and Society
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101631
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local perspectives, regional consequences: The socio-environmental impacts of sand harvesting in southern Africa

Magdalena Śmigaj, Syed Mustafa, C. M. Pringle, N Jovanovic et al.
The Extractive Industries and Society
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

Local perspectives, regional consequences: The socio-environmental impacts of sand harvesting in southern Africa

Magdalena Śmigaj, Syed Mustafa, C. M. Pringle, N Jovanovic, Jon McCosh, David W. Walker, Sithabile Tirivarombo, Kealeboga Moreri
article en

Abstract

• A suite of socio-environmental issues in both licensed and unlicensed operations were identified. • Experienced impacts and benefits strongly depended on geography and the type of mining activity. • Inadequate governance, monitoring, policing, and rehabilitation remain the main obstacles. • Knowledge gaps exist on mining extents, replenishment rates and effectiveness of rehabilitation. After water, sand is the most exploited resource on Earth, with extraction rates often exceeding the sustainable supply, impacting ecosystems and local communities. Still, there is very little information on the situation in southern Africa, despite the rapid economic growth in the region and associated increase in sand demand. This study aimed to address this gap by identifying the implications of sand extraction on local communities and the ecosystem, drawing upon the perspectives of local stakeholders. Qualitative data collected in Botswana, South Africa and Mozambique through stakeholder interviews, revealed a suite of environmental and social issues surrounding both licensed and unlicensed operations. The experienced negative impacts and benefits were occasionally contradictory in nature, strongly depending on characteristics relating to geography, and the type of sand harvesting activity. We subsequently explored links between experienced benefits, impacts and current regulatory frameworks through development of a Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, which highlighted that careful mining site selection and adherence to regulations could minimise socio-environmental impacts whilst achieving benefits. The findings of the study provided insights on the main obstacles for alleviating sand harvesting-related impacts and existing knowledge gaps that need to be first addressed to inform the development of more sustainable sand harvesting practices.

The Extractive Industries and SocietyVol. 23
University of Botswana (BW), Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BW), Institute of Natural Resources (ZA), Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management (ZA), University of the Western Cape (ZA), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Newcastle University, University of the Western Cape, Wageningen University and Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.