Revisiting the history of Sino-US relations: from sustained engagement to changed perception

As one of the most important bilateral relationships in the twenty-first century, the Sino-US relationship experienced a dramatic change from 2017, despite decades of positive engagement and zigzags since the normalization of relations. While there is still no clear consensus on how to precisely characterize today’s Sino-US relations, scholars tend to agree that the two countries have come to a critical crossroads of dilemmas and decisions, which will determine not only the future of the US and China but also the international order and the world to a greater extent. Taking a historical perspective, this paper aims to answer a key puzzle in the development of Sino-US relations—Why did the US end its long-practiced engagement strategy towards China in 2017? In other words, what killed the engagement? As many international observers are now blaming the end of the engagement on individual political leaders, the real cause has deeper roots. This paper will elaborate to suggest that there are two levels of causes considering how the engagement became a dead letter in 2017. One level being the changed perception of China—regarding itself, the outside world, the United States, and the engagement—which can be explained by domestic and international reasons. The second level is the decay and diminish of the various mutually reinforcing factors that the engagement relied on to sustain, such as positive understanding, continued political reform, and bureaucratic momentum. When these factors no longer work, the engagement between the United States and China will consequently last no more.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Global Society
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00147-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the history of Sino-US relations: from sustained engagement to changed perception

Alyssa Mengxue Li
2 citations
Discover Global Society
International Relations and Foreign Policy
17.04
article

Revisiting the history of Sino-US relations: from sustained engagement to changed perception

Alyssa Mengxue Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As one of the most important bilateral relationships in the twenty-first century, the Sino-US relationship experienced a dramatic change from 2017, despite decades of positive engagement and zigzags since the normalization of relations. While there is still no clear consensus on how to precisely characterize today’s Sino-US relations, scholars tend to agree that the two countries have come to a critical crossroads of dilemmas and decisions, which will determine not only the future of the US and China but also the international order and the world to a greater extent. Taking a historical perspective, this paper aims to answer a key puzzle in the development of Sino-US relations—Why did the US end its long-practiced engagement strategy towards China in 2017? In other words, what killed the engagement? As many international observers are now blaming the end of the engagement on individual political leaders, the real cause has deeper roots. This paper will elaborate to suggest that there are two levels of causes considering how the engagement became a dead letter in 2017. One level being the changed perception of China—regarding itself, the outside world, the United States, and the engagement—which can be explained by domestic and international reasons. The second level is the decay and diminish of the various mutually reinforcing factors that the engagement relied on to sustain, such as positive understanding, continued political reform, and bureaucratic momentum. When these factors no longer work, the engagement between the United States and China will consequently last no more.

Discover Global SocietyVol. 3(1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.