Nutrient production, water consumption, and stresses of large-scale versus small-scale agriculture: A global comparative analysis based on a gridded crop model

Agricultural water consumption is the main contributor to water scarcity worldwide, while small-scale and large-scale agriculture have distinguishing characteristics. Significant gaps remain in the process-based agricultural production and water consumption estimates distinguishing small-scale and large-scale agriculture, which inhibits our deep understanding of where, how, and by whom crops are produced and against what water outcomes. We close this gap by leveraging a gridded crop model, covering 61% of the global harvested area using a 2010 baseline. Results show small-scale agriculture accounts for 43% of the total harvested area, however, contributes to relatively less nutrient production despite cultivating more food crops (relative to their total harvested area) than large-scale agriculture. This result challenges the assumption made by existing global scale studies when allocating national agricultural production to small-scale and large-scale agriculture, which (partly) ignores the differences in climate conditions, soil characteristics, input level, and type of irrigation that small-scale versus large-scale agriculture may have. The lower contribution is due to both water and soil fertility stress. Small-scale agriculture overrepresents in water-scarce regions but consumes much less blue water (38%) compared to its harvested area (54%). In water-scarce regions, soil fertility stress causes small-scale agriculture the unproductive green water utilization and a 70–90% unmet crop production potential. Our findings demonstrate the unequal exposure and contribution to water scarcity between small-scale and large-scale agriculture and between food and non-food crops. Understanding such disparities is one of the first and necessary steps toward enhancing the resilience and sustainability of agricultural systems. • Global process-based crop production and water consumption estimates. • Small-scale agriculture contributes less to nutrient production considering its area. • The lower contribution is due to both water and soil fertility stress. • Small-scale agriculture consumes much less blue water in water-scarce regions. • Soil fertility stress makes small-scale agriculture use green water unproductively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Food Security
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100844
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutrient production, water consumption, and stresses of large-scale versus small-scale agriculture: A global comparative analysis based on a gridded crop model

Han Su, Maarten S. Krol, Rick J. Hogeboom, Bárbara Willaarts et al.
4 citations
Global Food Security
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
article

Nutrient production, water consumption, and stresses of large-scale versus small-scale agriculture: A global comparative analysis based on a gridded crop model

Han Su, Maarten S. Krol, Rick J. Hogeboom, Bárbara Willaarts, Timothy Foster, Oleksandr Mialyk, Diana Luna Gonzalez, Yafei Wang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Agricultural water consumption is the main contributor to water scarcity worldwide, while small-scale and large-scale agriculture have distinguishing characteristics. Significant gaps remain in the process-based agricultural production and water consumption estimates distinguishing small-scale and large-scale agriculture, which inhibits our deep understanding of where, how, and by whom crops are produced and against what water outcomes. We close this gap by leveraging a gridded crop model, covering 61% of the global harvested area using a 2010 baseline. Results show small-scale agriculture accounts for 43% of the total harvested area, however, contributes to relatively less nutrient production despite cultivating more food crops (relative to their total harvested area) than large-scale agriculture. This result challenges the assumption made by existing global scale studies when allocating national agricultural production to small-scale and large-scale agriculture, which (partly) ignores the differences in climate conditions, soil characteristics, input level, and type of irrigation that small-scale versus large-scale agriculture may have. The lower contribution is due to both water and soil fertility stress. Small-scale agriculture overrepresents in water-scarce regions but consumes much less blue water (38%) compared to its harvested area (54%). In water-scarce regions, soil fertility stress causes small-scale agriculture the unproductive green water utilization and a 70–90% unmet crop production potential. Our findings demonstrate the unequal exposure and contribution to water scarcity between small-scale and large-scale agriculture and between food and non-food crops. Understanding such disparities is one of the first and necessary steps toward enhancing the resilience and sustainability of agricultural systems. • Global process-based crop production and water consumption estimates. • Small-scale agriculture contributes less to nutrient production considering its area. • The lower contribution is due to both water and soil fertility stress. • Small-scale agriculture consumes much less blue water in water-scarce regions. • Soil fertility stress makes small-scale agriculture use green water unproductively.

Global Food SecurityVol. 45
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Manchester (GB), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Twente (NL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Vetenskapsrådet, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 European Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.