Assessment of the Impacts of Different Carbon Sources and Sinks on Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Based on GEOS-Chem

Global atmospheric CO2 concentrations, driven by anthropogenic emissions and natural carbon cycle dynamics, have emerged as a critical accelerator of climate change. However, due to the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of carbon sources and sinks, estimating CO2 flux remains highly uncertain. Accurately quantifying the contribution of various carbon sources and sinks to atmospheric CO2 concentration is essential for understanding the carbon cycle and global carbon balance. In this study, GEOS-Chem (version 13.2.1), driven by MERRA-2 meteorological data, was used to simulate monthly global CO2 concentrations from 2006 to 2010. The model was configured with a horizontal resolution of 2.5° longitude × 2.0° latitude and 47 vertical hybrid-sigma layers up to 0.01 hPa. To evaluate the impact of different emission sources and sinks, the “Inventory switching and replacing” approach was applied, designing a series of numerical experiments in which individual emission sources were selectively disabled. The contributions of eight major CO2 flux components, including fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning, balanced biosphere, net land exchange, aviation, shipping, ocean exchange, and chemical sources, were quantified by comparing the baseline simulation (BASE) with source-specific perturbation experiments (no_X). The results show that global CO2 concentration exhibits a spatial pattern with higher concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere and land areas, with East Asia, Southeast Asia, and eastern North America being high-concentration regions. The global average CO2 concentration increased by 1.8 ppm year−1 from 2006 to 2010, with China’s eastern region experiencing the highest growth rate of 3.0 ppm year−1. Fossil fuel combustion is identified as the largest CO2 emission source, followed by biomass burning, while oceans and land serve as significant CO2 sinks. The impact of carbon flux on atmospheric CO2 concentration is primarily determined by the spatial distribution of emissions, with higher flux intensities in industrialized and biomass-burning regions leading to more pronounced local concentration increases. Conversely, areas with strong carbon sinks, such as forests and oceans, exhibit lower net CO2 accumulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17061009
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Impacts of Different Carbon Sources and Sinks on Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Based on GEOS-Chem

Zhitao Zhou, Mengqian Su, Jia Zhou, Yongliang Yang et al.
4 citations
Remote Sensing
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
article

Assessment of the Impacts of Different Carbon Sources and Sinks on Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations Based on GEOS-Chem

Zhitao Zhou, Mengqian Su, Jia Zhou, Yongliang Yang, Ge Qu, Yusheng Shi, Wen Wu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Global atmospheric CO2 concentrations, driven by anthropogenic emissions and natural carbon cycle dynamics, have emerged as a critical accelerator of climate change. However, due to the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of carbon sources and sinks, estimating CO2 flux remains highly uncertain. Accurately quantifying the contribution of various carbon sources and sinks to atmospheric CO2 concentration is essential for understanding the carbon cycle and global carbon balance. In this study, GEOS-Chem (version 13.2.1), driven by MERRA-2 meteorological data, was used to simulate monthly global CO2 concentrations from 2006 to 2010. The model was configured with a horizontal resolution of 2.5° longitude × 2.0° latitude and 47 vertical hybrid-sigma layers up to 0.01 hPa. To evaluate the impact of different emission sources and sinks, the “Inventory switching and replacing” approach was applied, designing a series of numerical experiments in which individual emission sources were selectively disabled. The contributions of eight major CO2 flux components, including fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning, balanced biosphere, net land exchange, aviation, shipping, ocean exchange, and chemical sources, were quantified by comparing the baseline simulation (BASE) with source-specific perturbation experiments (no_X). The results show that global CO2 concentration exhibits a spatial pattern with higher concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere and land areas, with East Asia, Southeast Asia, and eastern North America being high-concentration regions. The global average CO2 concentration increased by 1.8 ppm year−1 from 2006 to 2010, with China’s eastern region experiencing the highest growth rate of 3.0 ppm year−1. Fossil fuel combustion is identified as the largest CO2 emission source, followed by biomass burning, while oceans and land serve as significant CO2 sinks. The impact of carbon flux on atmospheric CO2 concentration is primarily determined by the spatial distribution of emissions, with higher flux intensities in industrialized and biomass-burning regions leading to more pronounced local concentration increases. Conversely, areas with strong carbon sinks, such as forests and oceans, exhibit lower net CO2 accumulation.

Remote SensingVol. 17(6)
Harbin Normal University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.