Evaluating a Family Capacity-Building Service: Are We Doing More Good Than Harm?

<b>Background.</b> Parents of children with special needs are more likely to experience stress and have health-related problems. Pediatric occupational therapy interventions that build parents' capacity are often considered to be effective. It remains unclear how they can be offered without overburdening parents. <b>Purpose.</b> The purpose of this article is to share the findings from the evaluation of a flexible capacity-building occupational therapy service with seven families. <b>Method.</b> A convergent parallel mixed methods design was used to document parents' and occupational therapists' perspectives on the services, including outcomes, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. <b>Findings.</b> Parents reported understanding their children better, having more positive attitudes toward the challenges experienced, feeling more confident that they could help them, and having more satisfactory family routines. The importance for therapists to develop nonjudgmental collaborative relationships, to be flexible and to use the time available to help families with what matters the most in their daily lives came out particularly loudly. <b>Conclusion.</b> This study provides a concrete example of how it is possible to build families' capacities without overburdening them. It also provides guidance to establishments wishing to take a step back to think about how they build families' capacities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251323729
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating a Family Capacity-Building Service: Are We Doing More Good Than Harm?

Myriam Chrétien-Vincent, Élise Milot, Julie Bergeron, Emmanuelle Jasmin et al.
2 citations
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Family and Disability Support Research
4.61
article

Evaluating a Family Capacity-Building Service: Are We Doing More Good Than Harm?

Myriam Chrétien-Vincent, Élise Milot, Julie Bergeron, Emmanuelle Jasmin, Justine Marcotte, Marie Grandisson, Gabrielle Pratte, Cynthia Fauteux
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background.</b> Parents of children with special needs are more likely to experience stress and have health-related problems. Pediatric occupational therapy interventions that build parents' capacity are often considered to be effective. It remains unclear how they can be offered without overburdening parents. <b>Purpose.</b> The purpose of this article is to share the findings from the evaluation of a flexible capacity-building occupational therapy service with seven families. <b>Method.</b> A convergent parallel mixed methods design was used to document parents' and occupational therapists' perspectives on the services, including outcomes, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. <b>Findings.</b> Parents reported understanding their children better, having more positive attitudes toward the challenges experienced, feeling more confident that they could help them, and having more satisfactory family routines. The importance for therapists to develop nonjudgmental collaborative relationships, to be flexible and to use the time available to help families with what matters the most in their daily lives came out particularly loudly. <b>Conclusion.</b> This study provides a concrete example of how it is possible to build families' capacities without overburdening them. It also provides guidance to establishments wishing to take a step back to think about how they build families' capacities.

Canadian Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 92(2)
Fonds de recherche du Québec
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Family and Disability Support Research
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.