Classifying environmental publics: a public segmentation framework to predict climate change-related information seeking and activism

Purpose This study aims to propose a theoretical framework for public segmentation to identify various publics and conceptualize an activist public concerned with environmental issues, focusing specifically on the issue of climate change. Design/methodology/approach By incorporating the summation method of public segmentation from strategic communication research and levels of anger, this study identifies four types of environmental publics, using a survey with 585 people in the United States of America. Findings This study identifies four distinct environmental publics in relation to the climate change issue: (1) activist public (high activeness/high anger), (2) active-calm public (high activeness/low anger), (3) inactive-angry public (low activeness/high anger) and (4) unconcerned public (low activeness/low anger). This study explores the relationships between four environmental publics and their information seeking on climate change and engagement in environmental activism, both online and offline. Originality/value The study provides a segmentation framework for conceptualizing environmental publics and examines the relationships between environmental publics and their information seeking and activism behaviors. It contributes to existing segmentation literature by providing a new framework that can be used in segmenting publics. Also, the findings help practitioners strategically manage communication with different publics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Communication Management
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-04-2024-0062
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying environmental publics: a public segmentation framework to predict climate change-related information seeking and activism

Jarim Kim, Myoung‐Gi Chon
3 citations
Journal of Communication Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
11.59
article

Classifying environmental publics: a public segmentation framework to predict climate change-related information seeking and activism

Jarim Kim, Myoung‐Gi Chon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose a theoretical framework for public segmentation to identify various publics and conceptualize an activist public concerned with environmental issues, focusing specifically on the issue of climate change. Design/methodology/approach By incorporating the summation method of public segmentation from strategic communication research and levels of anger, this study identifies four types of environmental publics, using a survey with 585 people in the United States of America. Findings This study identifies four distinct environmental publics in relation to the climate change issue: (1) activist public (high activeness/high anger), (2) active-calm public (high activeness/low anger), (3) inactive-angry public (low activeness/high anger) and (4) unconcerned public (low activeness/low anger). This study explores the relationships between four environmental publics and their information seeking on climate change and engagement in environmental activism, both online and offline. Originality/value The study provides a segmentation framework for conceptualizing environmental publics and examines the relationships between environmental publics and their information seeking and activism behaviors. It contributes to existing segmentation literature by providing a new framework that can be used in segmenting publics. Also, the findings help practitioners strategically manage communication with different publics.

Journal of Communication ManagementVol. 29(4)
Yonsei University (KR), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
11.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.