Assessment of the Awareness of Risk Factors and Current Behavior Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background The burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is compounded by serious complications, including cardiovascular and microvascular diseases, with significant healthcare costs associated with these complications. Engaging in self-care practices can enhance glycemic control and empower individuals to make informed health decisions. The present study aims to assess the existing levels of awareness and understanding of diabetes, focusing on the perception of its risk factors and associated complications. Methodology This prospective, cross-sectional study involved 2,468 individuals with T2DM recruited from 26 sites across India. Data underwent aggregate-level analysis using Python and were assessed for statistical significance using the chi-square test. Continuous variables (means and standard deviations) were analyzed, and differences among groups were evaluated using analysis of variance. To assess the understanding of diabetes, including its symptoms and complications, all knowledge-related questions were aggregated into a composite score. Participants were categorized into three groups (high, medium, and low) based on their knowledge levels. The participant's variables across five dimensions, namely, diabetes causes and symptoms, medication usage, diet and lifestyle, hypoglycemia, and complications from diabetes, were assessed. The highest achievable score was 26, while the lowest was 0. Based on the knowledge score, individuals were classified into the following three groups: high for participants who scored 80% or more correct answers (score >20); medium for those scoring between 40% and 80% (score between 11 and 20); and low for participants with a score between 0 and 10, indicating fewer than 40% correct responses. Results The average participant age was 54.1 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 60:40. The average hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2%, with 629 (28%) maintaining levels within the target range (≤7%), and 497 (22%) having levels above 9%. Overall, 655 (26.50%) individuals were classified as high knowledge, 1,179 (47.77%) as medium knowledge, and 634 (25.68%) as low knowledge. Scores were 22.4 (1.2) for high knowledge, 15.9 (2.9) for medium, and 6.2 (3.0) for low. Diabetic complications were significantly higher in the high-knowledge group. Adherence to diabetes medication was higher in the high (509 (78.5%)) and medium (917 (81.6%)) knowledge groups (p < 0.001) compared to the low (363 (60.3%)) knowledge group. Participants with high and medium knowledge levels demonstrated significantly greater ownership and use of glucometers compared to those with lower knowledge levels. Conclusions Individuals with T2DM who experience complications tend to have a greater understanding of diabetes and its risk factors than those without complications. This suggests that facing health issues motivates individuals to seek information, improving their knowledge and influencing better medication adherence and lifestyle choices. The findings of this study, coupled with existing data, underscore the urgent need for innovative approaches to engage and motivate individuals through targeted educational initiatives, comprehensive counseling, regular monitoring, and strategies to improve adherence to recommended diabetes management practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80512
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Awareness of Risk Factors and Current Behavior Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India: A Cross-Sectional Study

Ashish Saxena, Anil Samaria, Aravinda Jagadeesha, S. S. Dariya et al.
2 citations
Cureus
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
2.59
article

Assessment of the Awareness of Risk Factors and Current Behavior Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India: A Cross-Sectional Study

Ashish Saxena, Anil Samaria, Aravinda Jagadeesha, S. S. Dariya, A. Tewari, Sajid Ansari, Arun Kumar Kedia, L. Sreenivasamurthy, Ashish Dengra, Dhruvi Hasnani, Vipul Chavda, Rajnish Saxena, Vijay Viswanathan, Bharat Saboo, D.C. Agarwal, Alok Modi, Mohsin Aslam, Anurag Varma, Sandeep Suri, Nagendra Kumar Singh, Awadhesh N. Singh, Anuj Maheshwari, Anil Kumar Virmani, Kannan Natarajan, Ashutosh Chaturvedi, Jayant Panda, G D Ramchandani, Bijay Patni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background The burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is compounded by serious complications, including cardiovascular and microvascular diseases, with significant healthcare costs associated with these complications. Engaging in self-care practices can enhance glycemic control and empower individuals to make informed health decisions. The present study aims to assess the existing levels of awareness and understanding of diabetes, focusing on the perception of its risk factors and associated complications. Methodology This prospective, cross-sectional study involved 2,468 individuals with T2DM recruited from 26 sites across India. Data underwent aggregate-level analysis using Python and were assessed for statistical significance using the chi-square test. Continuous variables (means and standard deviations) were analyzed, and differences among groups were evaluated using analysis of variance. To assess the understanding of diabetes, including its symptoms and complications, all knowledge-related questions were aggregated into a composite score. Participants were categorized into three groups (high, medium, and low) based on their knowledge levels. The participant's variables across five dimensions, namely, diabetes causes and symptoms, medication usage, diet and lifestyle, hypoglycemia, and complications from diabetes, were assessed. The highest achievable score was 26, while the lowest was 0. Based on the knowledge score, individuals were classified into the following three groups: high for participants who scored 80% or more correct answers (score >20); medium for those scoring between 40% and 80% (score between 11 and 20); and low for participants with a score between 0 and 10, indicating fewer than 40% correct responses. Results The average participant age was 54.1 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 60:40. The average hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2%, with 629 (28%) maintaining levels within the target range (≤7%), and 497 (22%) having levels above 9%. Overall, 655 (26.50%) individuals were classified as high knowledge, 1,179 (47.77%) as medium knowledge, and 634 (25.68%) as low knowledge. Scores were 22.4 (1.2) for high knowledge, 15.9 (2.9) for medium, and 6.2 (3.0) for low. Diabetic complications were significantly higher in the high-knowledge group. Adherence to diabetes medication was higher in the high (509 (78.5%)) and medium (917 (81.6%)) knowledge groups (p < 0.001) compared to the low (363 (60.3%)) knowledge group. Participants with high and medium knowledge levels demonstrated significantly greater ownership and use of glucometers compared to those with lower knowledge levels. Conclusions Individuals with T2DM who experience complications tend to have a greater understanding of diabetes and its risk factors than those without complications. This suggests that facing health issues motivates individuals to seek information, improving their knowledge and influencing better medication adherence and lifestyle choices. The findings of this study, coupled with existing data, underscore the urgent need for innovative approaches to engage and motivate individuals through targeted educational initiatives, comprehensive counseling, regular monitoring, and strategies to improve adherence to recommended diabetes management practices.

CureusVol. 17(3)
Gauhati Medical College and Hospital (IN), University of Lucknow (IN), National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur (IN), Indira Gandhi Agricultural University (IN), Diabetes Australia (AU), NIMS University (IN), Motilal Nehru Medical College (IN), Sriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College Hospital (IN), Indra (Spain) (ES), Art Research Centre of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), HLL Lifecare (India) (IN), Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (IN), Diabetes Care and Research Foundation (IN), Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital (IN), Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (IN), Diabetes Care Center (US), Bangalore Diabetes Centre (IN), Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (IN), Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), keiyu Hospital (JP), Public Works Department Buildings and Roads (IN), M.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Diabetes Research Centre (IN), Indus University (IN), Jaipur National University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.