HC-Pro inhibits HEN1 methyltransferase activity, leading to autophagic degradation of AGO1
Helper-component proteinase (HC-Pro), encoded by potyviruses, function as viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs). Despite their conserved role, HC-Pros share approximately 40% similarity, implying potential differences in VSR efficiency, particularly in their ability to inhibit HEN1 methyltransferase activity. This study investigated the inhibitory potential of HC-Pros from different potyviruses in transgenic plants. P1/HC-Pro from turnip mosaic virus (P1/HC-Pro<sup>Tu</sup>) exhibited the most potent inhibition of HEN1, followed by P1/HC-Pro from zucchini yellow mosaic virus (P1/HC-Pro<sup>Zy</sup>), while P1/HC-Pro from tobacco etch virus (P1/HC-Pro<sup>Te</sup>) showed the weakest inhibitory effect. These differential effectual effects corresponded to variations in unmethylated microRNAs (unMet-miRNAs) accumulation across the transgenic lines. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis indicated that HC-Pro<sup>Tu</sup> recruits HEN1 and ATG8a to HC-Pro bodies (H-bodies) and indirectly associates with AGO1, potentially influencing the assembly of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and leading to the accumulation of free-form miRNA duplexes. The ability of HC-Pro<sup>Tu</sup> to sequester HEN1 and AGO1 in H-bodies may, therefore, modulate miRNA loading. This observation aligns with the finding that P1/HC-Pro<sup>Tu</sup> plants harbored approximately 50% unMet-miRNAs and exhibited the lowest AGO1 levels, suggesting a positive correlation between HEN1 inhibition and autophagic degradation of AGO1. Interestingly, unMet-miRNAs are absent in the AGO1 of P1/HC-Pro<sup>Tu</sup> plants but reappeared in P1/HC-Pro<sup>Tu</sup>/hen1-8/heso1-1 plants, accompanied by signs of AGO1 recovery. These findings highlight the functional diversity of HC-Pro VSRs and provide new insights into their differential effects on miRNA methylation, RISC assembly, and the regulation of RNA silencing pathways.
Authors
- Sin-Fen Hu
- Han-Han Chang
- Tang‐Long Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6264-3608)
- Wei-Lun Wei
- Pin-Chun Lin
- Ru-Ying Fang
- Syuan‐Fei Hong
- Chia‐Chi Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1272-1513)
- Phuong-Anh Tran
- Thanh Ha Pham
- Choun‐Sea Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-2952)
- Hsin‐Yi Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-0201)
- Wann‐Neng Jane
- Shih‐Shun Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-5004)
- Jiao Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-5425)
- Bing‐Nan Shen
- Yu‐Ling Hung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7804-1373)
- Fu‐Hui Wu
- Zhao‐Jun Pan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3138-5164)
- Chul‐Woong Chung
- Chiung‐Hsiang Cheng
- Qianwen Shang
- John L. Bowman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7347-3691)
Institutions
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica (TW)
- Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica (TW)
- Monash University (AU)
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-03-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56320-z
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.75