Leveraging Spectral Neighborhood Information for Corn Yield Prediction with Spatial-Lagged Machine Learning Modeling: Can Neighborhood Information Outperform Vegetation Indices?

Accurate and reliable crop yield prediction is essential for optimizing agricultural management, resource allocation, and decision-making, while also supporting farmers and stakeholders in adapting to climate change and increasing global demand. This study introduces an innovative approach to crop yield prediction by incorporating spatially lagged spectral data (SLSD) through the spatial-lagged machine learning (SLML) model, an enhanced version of the spatial lag X (SLX) model. The research aims to show that SLSD improves prediction compared to traditional vegetation index (VI)-based methods. Conducted on a 19-hectare cornfield at the ARS Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory during the 2023 growing season, this study used five-band multispectral image data and 8581 yield measurements ranging from 1.69 to 15.86 Mg/Ha. Four predictor sets were evaluated: Set 1 (spectral bands), Set 2 (spectral bands + neighborhood data), Set 3 (spectral bands + VIs), and Set 4 (spectral bands + top VIs + neighborhood data). These were evaluated using the SLX model and four decision-tree-based SLML models (RF, XGB, ET, GBR), with performance assessed using R2 and RMSE. Results showed that incorporating spatial neighborhood data (Set 2) outperformed VI-based approaches (Set 3), emphasizing the importance of spatial context. SLML models, particularly XGB, RF, and ET, performed best with 4–8 neighbors, while excessive neighbors slightly reduced accuracy. In Set 3, VIs improved predictions, but a smaller subset (10–15 indices) was sufficient for optimal yield prediction. Set 4 showed slight gains over Sets 2 and 3, with XGB and RF achieving the highest R2 values. Key predictors included spatially lagged spectral bands (e.g., Green_lag, NIR_lag, RedEdge_lag) and VIs (e.g., CREI, GCI, NCPI, ARI, CCCI), highlighting the value of integrating neighborhood data for improved corn yield prediction. This study underscores the importance of spatial context in corn yield prediction and lays the foundation for future research across diverse agricultural settings, focusing on optimizing neighborhood size, integrating spatial and spectral data, and refining spatial dependencies through localized search algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6030058
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Spectral Neighborhood Information for Corn Yield Prediction with Spatial-Lagged Machine Learning Modeling: Can Neighborhood Information Outperform Vegetation Indices?

Chad Hajda, Javier M. Osorio Leyton, Douglas R. Smith, Kabindra Adhikari et al.
4 citations
AI
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
6.87
article

Leveraging Spectral Neighborhood Information for Corn Yield Prediction with Spatial-Lagged Machine Learning Modeling: Can Neighborhood Information Outperform Vegetation Indices?

Chad Hajda, Javier M. Osorio Leyton, Douglas R. Smith, Kabindra Adhikari, Efrain Noa‐Yarasca
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accurate and reliable crop yield prediction is essential for optimizing agricultural management, resource allocation, and decision-making, while also supporting farmers and stakeholders in adapting to climate change and increasing global demand. This study introduces an innovative approach to crop yield prediction by incorporating spatially lagged spectral data (SLSD) through the spatial-lagged machine learning (SLML) model, an enhanced version of the spatial lag X (SLX) model. The research aims to show that SLSD improves prediction compared to traditional vegetation index (VI)-based methods. Conducted on a 19-hectare cornfield at the ARS Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory during the 2023 growing season, this study used five-band multispectral image data and 8581 yield measurements ranging from 1.69 to 15.86 Mg/Ha. Four predictor sets were evaluated: Set 1 (spectral bands), Set 2 (spectral bands + neighborhood data), Set 3 (spectral bands + VIs), and Set 4 (spectral bands + top VIs + neighborhood data). These were evaluated using the SLX model and four decision-tree-based SLML models (RF, XGB, ET, GBR), with performance assessed using R2 and RMSE. Results showed that incorporating spatial neighborhood data (Set 2) outperformed VI-based approaches (Set 3), emphasizing the importance of spatial context. SLML models, particularly XGB, RF, and ET, performed best with 4–8 neighbors, while excessive neighbors slightly reduced accuracy. In Set 3, VIs improved predictions, but a smaller subset (10–15 indices) was sufficient for optimal yield prediction. Set 4 showed slight gains over Sets 2 and 3, with XGB and RF achieving the highest R2 values. Key predictors included spatially lagged spectral bands (e.g., Green_lag, NIR_lag, RedEdge_lag) and VIs (e.g., CREI, GCI, NCPI, ARI, CCCI), highlighting the value of integrating neighborhood data for improved corn yield prediction. This study underscores the importance of spatial context in corn yield prediction and lays the foundation for future research across diverse agricultural settings, focusing on optimizing neighborhood size, integrating spatial and spectral data, and refining spatial dependencies through localized search algorithms.

AIVol. 6(3)
United States Department of Agriculture (US), Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.