Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET: A Reality Check

Measuring total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images in clinical practice requires a fast, reliable, and easy-to-perform multilesional segmentation workflow. We conducted a field test to derive total metabolic volumes using 5 representative baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The scans were transferred to 10 different sites or readers who used different commercially available software platforms to derive TMTV after a recently proposed benchmark workflow. Observed TMTVs were compared with reference values, and overall analysis times were reported. Our results show that TMTVs can be obtained with reasonable accuracy across readers and platforms (within 10% compared with reference benchmark values for most TMTVs) but that processing times can vary considerably depending on reader experience and the software platform. Our study showed that there is an urgent need to improve TMTV segmentation workflows in clinical practice, requiring closer collaboration between users and software vendors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269271
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check

Laurence Champion, Bart de Keizer, Roelf Valkema, Cristina Mitea et al.
10 citations
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
13.60
article

Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check

Laurence Champion, Bart de Keizer, Roelf Valkema, Cristina Mitea, Fanny Orlhac, Ronald Boellaard, Julia E. Huijbregts, Sally F. Barrington, Josée M. Zijlstra, Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, Petra Dibbets‐Schneider, Daphne Lobeek, Gerben J.C. Zwezerijnen, Sanne E. Wiegers, Floris H. P. van Velden, Irène Buvat, Anne I.J. Arens, Nelleke Tolboom, Narinée Hovhannisyan‐Baghdasarian, Filiz Çelik
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Measuring total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images in clinical practice requires a fast, reliable, and easy-to-perform multilesional segmentation workflow. We conducted a field test to derive total metabolic volumes using 5 representative baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The scans were transferred to 10 different sites or readers who used different commercially available software platforms to derive TMTV after a recently proposed benchmark workflow. Observed TMTVs were compared with reference values, and overall analysis times were reported. Our results show that TMTVs can be obtained with reasonable accuracy across readers and platforms (within 10% compared with reference benchmark values for most TMTVs) but that processing times can vary considerably depending on reader experience and the software platform. Our study showed that there is an urgent need to improve TMTV segmentation workflows in clinical practice, requiring closer collaboration between users and software vendors.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 66(5)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), King's College London (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Hovon (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Rijnstate Hospital (NL), Deventer Ziekenhuis (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Institut Curie (FR), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
13.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.