Stalemate? The complex relationship between educational chess and students’ skills

• We assess the impact of learning chess on a set of skills of 12-year-old students. • Our experimental design combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. • The effects of chess on cognitive and non-cognitive skills are null. • Students in the treated group show a better command of chess skills. • The intensity and timing of the intervention may explain the results. Over the last decade, an increasing number of countries have integrated chess as a pedagogical tool and even as core content of their academic curricula. Nonetheless, the evidence regarding the causal effects of chess on a range of skills remains inconclusive. We report new evidence of the impact of learning chess in school on a set of cognitive and non-cognitive skills of 12-year-old students to shed light on this matter. To do this, we take advantage of the implementation of a phase-in program introducing chess into a set of schools in Catalonia (Spain). This experimental setting enables us to estimate the causal effects of practicing educational chess at school on critical thinking, attention, patience, and risk aversion. Results show that, after one academic year, the differences between the treated and control group are not statistically significant for any of these outcomes. Students who took part in the chess program significantly outperformed the students in the control group only in terms of their chess-playing knowledge and proficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101819
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stalemate? The complex relationship between educational chess and students’ skills

Daniel Santín González, Álvaro Choi, Gabriela Sicilia, María José Rubio Hurtado et al.
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

Stalemate? The complex relationship between educational chess and students’ skills

Daniel Santín González, Álvaro Choi, Gabriela Sicilia, María José Rubio Hurtado, Rosa Simancas
article en

Abstract

• We assess the impact of learning chess on a set of skills of 12-year-old students. • Our experimental design combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. • The effects of chess on cognitive and non-cognitive skills are null. • Students in the treated group show a better command of chess skills. • The intensity and timing of the intervention may explain the results. Over the last decade, an increasing number of countries have integrated chess as a pedagogical tool and even as core content of their academic curricula. Nonetheless, the evidence regarding the causal effects of chess on a range of skills remains inconclusive. We report new evidence of the impact of learning chess in school on a set of cognitive and non-cognitive skills of 12-year-old students to shed light on this matter. To do this, we take advantage of the implementation of a phase-in program introducing chess into a set of schools in Catalonia (Spain). This experimental setting enables us to estimate the causal effects of practicing educational chess at school on critical thinking, attention, patience, and risk aversion. Results show that, after one academic year, the differences between the treated and control group are not statistically significant for any of these outcomes. Students who took part in the chess program significantly outperformed the students in the control group only in terms of their chess-playing knowledge and proficiency.

Thinking Skills and CreativityVol. 57
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), Clínica Diagonal (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
“la Caixa” Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.