Weight loss dynamics after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective single center analysis with age and preoperative weight stratification

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure worldwide. However, the influence of preoperative factors on weight loss outcomes remains incompletely understood. We investigated the effects of preoperative weight, height, and age on total weight loss percentage (%TWL) following LSG using advanced statistical modeling. 2014 LSG patients were analyzed and stratified by preoperative weight (7 categories: <90 kg to > 160 kg) and age (5 groups: 14-25 to ≥ 56 years). %TWL was calculated at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. A Generalized Additive Model (GAM) was used to calculate Adjusted Total Weight Loss percentage (%ATWL), accounting for height and preoperative weight confounding effects. The population (mean age: 38.0 ± 11.4 years, BMI: 42.9 ± 8.2 kg/m²) showed weight-dependent %TWL at 12 months, from 32.2%±10.0% (< 90 kg) to 39.8%±7.5% (> 160 kg) (p < 0.001). GAM-adjusted %ATWL revealed superior outcomes in younger cohorts. The 14-25 and 26-35 year groups had comparable 12-month %ATWL (38.2% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.222), significantly exceeding older groups (p < 0.001). Early postoperative %ATWL (1-week) was similar across ages (4.6-5.7%), with progressive differentiation at 3, 6, and 12 months. Preoperative weight and age significantly influence LSG weight loss outcomes. Younger patients and those with higher pre-op weights achieved greater 12-month %TWL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93826-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weight loss dynamics after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective single center analysis with age and preoperative weight stratification

Yusuf Emre Altundal, Süleyman Büyükaşık, Ali Etemad, Burak Kankaya et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
2.01
article

Weight loss dynamics after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective single center analysis with age and preoperative weight stratification

Yusuf Emre Altundal, Süleyman Büyükaşık, Ali Etemad, Burak Kankaya, Mustafa Ozgul, Halil Alış, Paria Rahmanbakhsh, Esra Guzelaltuncekic
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure worldwide. However, the influence of preoperative factors on weight loss outcomes remains incompletely understood. We investigated the effects of preoperative weight, height, and age on total weight loss percentage (%TWL) following LSG using advanced statistical modeling. 2014 LSG patients were analyzed and stratified by preoperative weight (7 categories: <90 kg to > 160 kg) and age (5 groups: 14-25 to ≥ 56 years). %TWL was calculated at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. A Generalized Additive Model (GAM) was used to calculate Adjusted Total Weight Loss percentage (%ATWL), accounting for height and preoperative weight confounding effects. The population (mean age: 38.0 ± 11.4 years, BMI: 42.9 ± 8.2 kg/m²) showed weight-dependent %TWL at 12 months, from 32.2%±10.0% (< 90 kg) to 39.8%±7.5% (> 160 kg) (p < 0.001). GAM-adjusted %ATWL revealed superior outcomes in younger cohorts. The 14-25 and 26-35 year groups had comparable 12-month %ATWL (38.2% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.222), significantly exceeding older groups (p < 0.001). Early postoperative %ATWL (1-week) was similar across ages (4.6-5.7%), with progressive differentiation at 3, 6, and 12 months. Preoperative weight and age significantly influence LSG weight loss outcomes. Younger patients and those with higher pre-op weights achieved greater 12-month %TWL.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Istanbul Aydın University (TR), University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.