Covariate-adjusted estimators of diagnostic accuracy in randomized trials

Randomized controlled trials evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of a marker frequently collect information on baseline covariates in addition to information on the marker and the reference standard. However, standard estimators of sensitivity and specificity do not use data on baseline covariates and restrict the analysis to data from participants with a positive reference standard in the intervention arm being evaluated. Covariate-adjusted estimators for marginal treatment effects have been developed and been advocated for by regulatory agencies because they can improve power compared to unadjusted estimators. Despite this, similar covariate-adjusted estimators for marginal sensitivity and specificity have not yet been developed. In this manuscript, we address this gap by developing covariate-adjusted estimators for marginal sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test that leverage baseline covariate information. The estimators also use data from all participants, not just participants with a positive reference standard in the intervention arm being evaluated. We derive the asymptotic properties of the estimators and evaluate the finite sample properties of the estimators using simulations and by analyzing data on lung cancer screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biostatistics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf005
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Covariate-adjusted estimators of diagnostic accuracy in randomized trials

Jon A. Steingrimsson
Biostatistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Covariate-adjusted estimators of diagnostic accuracy in randomized trials

Jon A. Steingrimsson
article en

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of a marker frequently collect information on baseline covariates in addition to information on the marker and the reference standard. However, standard estimators of sensitivity and specificity do not use data on baseline covariates and restrict the analysis to data from participants with a positive reference standard in the intervention arm being evaluated. Covariate-adjusted estimators for marginal treatment effects have been developed and been advocated for by regulatory agencies because they can improve power compared to unadjusted estimators. Despite this, similar covariate-adjusted estimators for marginal sensitivity and specificity have not yet been developed. In this manuscript, we address this gap by developing covariate-adjusted estimators for marginal sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test that leverage baseline covariate information. The estimators also use data from all participants, not just participants with a positive reference standard in the intervention arm being evaluated. We derive the asymptotic properties of the estimators and evaluate the finite sample properties of the estimators using simulations and by analyzing data on lung cancer screening.

BiostatisticsVol. 26(1)
Brown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.