Comparative Analysis Of Deep Learning for Robust Deepfake Detection

With Deepfake technology rapidly growing and its use on the rise, there is an increased demand for effectiveness of its detection. This paper performs a comparative analysis of 4 deep learning algorithms – Meso-4, MesoInception-4, Resnet50, DenseNet-121. We will investigate each algorithm’s architecture, performance validation and versatility. The indepth overview will shed some light on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, etc. The dataset will encompass the real and fake community videos for a well-rounded assess on each algorithm’s effectiveness. The results of the research will help to with the potential practical applications of the reviewed algorithms, and mention possible changes and improvements. The results of the research have shown both strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm, giving clarity as to the potential use in practice, and changes that could be made in future. The overall aim of the dissolution is to guide the reader through the process of understanding the difference between the 4 algorithms – Meso-4, MesoInception-4, Resnet-50 and DenseNet-121.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aece62803.2024.10911049
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis Of Deep Learning for Robust Deepfake Detection

R. C. Kapoor, Jaspreet Singh, Vandana Mehndiratta
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Comparative Analysis Of Deep Learning for Robust Deepfake Detection

R. C. Kapoor, Jaspreet Singh, Vandana Mehndiratta
article en

Abstract

With Deepfake technology rapidly growing and its use on the rise, there is an increased demand for effectiveness of its detection. This paper performs a comparative analysis of 4 deep learning algorithms – Meso-4, MesoInception-4, Resnet50, DenseNet-121. We will investigate each algorithm’s architecture, performance validation and versatility. The indepth overview will shed some light on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, etc. The dataset will encompass the real and fake community videos for a well-rounded assess on each algorithm’s effectiveness. The results of the research will help to with the potential practical applications of the reviewed algorithms, and mention possible changes and improvements. The results of the research have shown both strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm, giving clarity as to the potential use in practice, and changes that could be made in future. The overall aim of the dissolution is to guide the reader through the process of understanding the difference between the 4 algorithms – Meso-4, MesoInception-4, Resnet-50 and DenseNet-121.

Christ University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.