Deep Learning Based Binary Classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: A Comparative Study on CNN and VIT Models

This research concerns binary classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) using two deep learning models, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) along with Vision Transformers (ViTs). We use three different datasets, which consist of both histopathological and ultrasound images for training and comparison among the models. CNNs outperformed ViTs in terms of state-of-the-art accuracy and computational efficiency with a maximum accuracy up to 97.03% for certain datasets, while ViTs performed extremely well with an impressive recall value but could not perform as well as CNNs leading towards more false positives. The performances of CNNs are reported to be more accurate in terms of both resource-constrained and IDC classification. We aim to further refine the latter by integrating CNNs and ViTs within hybrid models for increased performance, in addition to explore the explainable AI to increase clinical trustworthiness and adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wiecon-ece64149.2024.10915172
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning Based Binary Classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: A Comparative Study on CNN and VIT Models

R. Ishwariya, V Nikhil, B Sai
2 citations
AI in cancer detection
0.69
article

Deep Learning Based Binary Classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: A Comparative Study on CNN and VIT Models

R. Ishwariya, V Nikhil, B Sai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research concerns binary classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) using two deep learning models, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) along with Vision Transformers (ViTs). We use three different datasets, which consist of both histopathological and ultrasound images for training and comparison among the models. CNNs outperformed ViTs in terms of state-of-the-art accuracy and computational efficiency with a maximum accuracy up to 97.03% for certain datasets, while ViTs performed extremely well with an impressive recall value but could not perform as well as CNNs leading towards more false positives. The performances of CNNs are reported to be more accurate in terms of both resource-constrained and IDC classification. We aim to further refine the latter by integrating CNNs and ViTs within hybrid models for increased performance, in addition to explore the explainable AI to increase clinical trustworthiness and adoption.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
AI in cancer detection
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.