Rectifying and Discriminating Hard Negatives for Biomedical Retrieval Question Answering

Retrieval Question Answering (ReQA) is a pivotal task in biomedical natural language processing, where the bi-encoders is a commonly employed solution due to its efficiency in retrieving answers from large candidate pools. However, bi-encoders falls short in capturing fine-grained interactions between questions and answers, a limitation that is even more pronounced in the biomedical field due to the inadequate model training caused by data scarcity. In recent developments, researchers have introduced hard in-batch negative sampling to enhance performance by enriching the training process with informative instances. However, the utilization of hard negative samples introduces new challenges: the emergence of false negatives that can mislead the training process, and the suboptimal quality of sentence embeddings further hampers the bi-encoderss ability to discriminate hard negative samples effectively. To address these challenges, we propose the Rectifying and Discriminating Hard negatives (RigHt) framework. RigHt rectifies negative sample labels through cross-encoder interaction, mitigating the impact of false negatives. Simultaneously, it enhances the bi-encoders to discriminate hard negative samples by refining disentangled sentence embeddings. Extensive experimental results on five datasets substantiate the efficacy of our proposed approach in enhancing the training of the bi-encoders model with hard negative samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcbbio.2025.3551290
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rectifying and Discriminating Hard Negatives for Biomedical Retrieval Question Answering

Bo Zhao, Chenghua Lin, Wenge Rong, Jun Bai et al.
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Topic Modeling
article

Rectifying and Discriminating Hard Negatives for Biomedical Retrieval Question Answering

Bo Zhao, Chenghua Lin, Wenge Rong, Jun Bai, Chen Li, Zhenzi Li
article en

Abstract

Retrieval Question Answering (ReQA) is a pivotal task in biomedical natural language processing, where the bi-encoders is a commonly employed solution due to its efficiency in retrieving answers from large candidate pools. However, bi-encoders falls short in capturing fine-grained interactions between questions and answers, a limitation that is even more pronounced in the biomedical field due to the inadequate model training caused by data scarcity. In recent developments, researchers have introduced hard in-batch negative sampling to enhance performance by enriching the training process with informative instances. However, the utilization of hard negative samples introduces new challenges: the emergence of false negatives that can mislead the training process, and the suboptimal quality of sentence embeddings further hampers the bi-encoderss ability to discriminate hard negative samples effectively. To address these challenges, we propose the Rectifying and Discriminating Hard negatives (RigHt) framework. RigHt rectifies negative sample labels through cross-encoder interaction, mitigating the impact of false negatives. Simultaneously, it enhances the bi-encoders to discriminate hard negative samples by refining disentangled sentence embeddings. Extensive experimental results on five datasets substantiate the efficacy of our proposed approach in enhancing the training of the bi-encoders model with hard negative samples.

IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsVol. 22(3)
University of Manchester (GB), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN), Beijing Institute for General Artificial Intelligence (CN), Beihang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.