Understanding the Open-Access Practices of China’s Science, Technology, and Mathematics Journals: Insights from Editors

Science, technology, and medical (STM) journals have been pivotal in driving the development of open access (OA). This study explores the factors influencing the implementation of OA practices in STM journals through a qualitative analysis of the insights of seventeen STM journal editors in China. Using semi-structured interviews and grounded coding analysis, the authors identified five main categories and thirteen subcategories of factors that impact OA practices for STM journals. Subsequently, a theoretical framework that elucidates the positions and interrelationships of these categories is developed. The findings suggest that motivation and behavioural intention form the main storyline for STM journals’ OA practices, while individual differences, social reference norms, and institutional policy context serve as situational influencing factors. This study offers valuable insights into the dynamics of scholarly communication and guides future OA movements in China and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2023-0032
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Open-Access Practices of China’s Science, Technology, and Mathematics Journals: Insights from Editors

FU Wen-qi, Qing Fang, Hanqing Ma, Jie Xu et al.
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Understanding the Open-Access Practices of China’s Science, Technology, and Mathematics Journals: Insights from Editors

FU Wen-qi, Qing Fang, Hanqing Ma, Jie Xu, Jinqiang Ding
article en

Abstract

Science, technology, and medical (STM) journals have been pivotal in driving the development of open access (OA). This study explores the factors influencing the implementation of OA practices in STM journals through a qualitative analysis of the insights of seventeen STM journal editors in China. Using semi-structured interviews and grounded coding analysis, the authors identified five main categories and thirteen subcategories of factors that impact OA practices for STM journals. Subsequently, a theoretical framework that elucidates the positions and interrelationships of these categories is developed. The findings suggest that motivation and behavioural intention form the main storyline for STM journals’ OA practices, while individual differences, social reference norms, and institutional policy context serve as situational influencing factors. This study offers valuable insights into the dynamics of scholarly communication and guides future OA movements in China and beyond.

Journal of Scholarly PublishingVol. 55(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.