Efficacy of bright light therapy for perinatal depression: A meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Pharmacological treatments are commonly used in individuals experiencing perinatal depression (PPD); however, a debate regarding the reproductive safety of antidepressants is ongoing. Many pregnant women opt to discontinue antidepressant out of concern about potential negative effects on the developing fetus, while slow and ineffective antidepressant medications hinder improved outcomes in women with PPD. In recent years, bright light therapy (BLT) has gained traction as a treatment option for PPD; however, clinical trials findings examining the efficacy of BLT in this population have been inconclusive. AIM To validate the feasibility and safety of BLT for the treatment of PPD. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of patients with PPD treated with BLT vs placebo following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled studies published up to December 2023. The results were evaluated using the standardized mean difference of improvement for depression scores and odds ratios (ORs) for remission rate, response rate, incidence of adverse events, and dropout rate. RESULTS The BLT group had higher PPD response rate [50.68% vs 33.08%; OR = 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.35; P = 0.004; I ² = 35%] and remission rate (54.10% vs 18.52%; OR = 5.00; 95%CI: 2.09-11.99; P = 0.0003; I ² = 0%) than the placebo group. Improvements in depression scores were higher in the BLT group than the placebo group for the overall efficacy (standardized mean difference = -0.47; 95%CI: -0.80 to -0.13; P = 0.007). No significant differences between the two groups in drop-outs (21.84% vs 29.63%; OR = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.31-1.29; P = 0.21; I ² = 0%) or adverse events (17.89% vs 9.68%; OR = 2.01; 95%CI: 0.95-4.25; P = 0.07; I ² = 0%) were observed. CONCLUSION BLT can potentially treat PPD, showing better results than the control group in this study. BLT is effective and safe and could increase the available therapeutic options for PPD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i1.99971
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of bright light therapy for perinatal depression: A meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Yujie Ma, Lan Wang, Xue Yang, Cuixia An et al.
1 citations
World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
1.88
article

Efficacy of bright light therapy for perinatal depression: A meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Yujie Ma, Lan Wang, Xue Yang, Cuixia An, Lixia Jiao, Shahid Bashir, Ran Wang, Xueyi Wang, Yuanyuan Gao, Jincheng Wang, Shuqi Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pharmacological treatments are commonly used in individuals experiencing perinatal depression (PPD); however, a debate regarding the reproductive safety of antidepressants is ongoing. Many pregnant women opt to discontinue antidepressant out of concern about potential negative effects on the developing fetus, while slow and ineffective antidepressant medications hinder improved outcomes in women with PPD. In recent years, bright light therapy (BLT) has gained traction as a treatment option for PPD; however, clinical trials findings examining the efficacy of BLT in this population have been inconclusive. AIM To validate the feasibility and safety of BLT for the treatment of PPD. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of patients with PPD treated with BLT vs placebo following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled studies published up to December 2023. The results were evaluated using the standardized mean difference of improvement for depression scores and odds ratios (ORs) for remission rate, response rate, incidence of adverse events, and dropout rate. RESULTS The BLT group had higher PPD response rate [50.68% vs 33.08%; OR = 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.35; P = 0.004; I ² = 35%] and remission rate (54.10% vs 18.52%; OR = 5.00; 95%CI: 2.09-11.99; P = 0.0003; I ² = 0%) than the placebo group. Improvements in depression scores were higher in the BLT group than the placebo group for the overall efficacy (standardized mean difference = -0.47; 95%CI: -0.80 to -0.13; P = 0.007). No significant differences between the two groups in drop-outs (21.84% vs 29.63%; OR = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.31-1.29; P = 0.21; I ² = 0%) or adverse events (17.89% vs 9.68%; OR = 2.01; 95%CI: 0.95-4.25; P = 0.07; I ² = 0%) were observed. CONCLUSION BLT can potentially treat PPD, showing better results than the control group in this study. BLT is effective and safe and could increase the available therapeutic options for PPD.

World Journal of Meta-AnalysisVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.