Development of the Dentofacial Appearance Perception Scale: Validity and reliability study

Concerns about the appearance of teeth and mouth, which play a key role in communication and first impressions, are natural to some extent. However, excessive concern over these areas should raise suspicion of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). The use of a validated and standardized screening tool in dental settings may improve the identification of BDD. This study aims to develop a validated tool to alert dentists to potential BDD cases among patients seeking cosmetic dental procedures. The research team conducted a literature review and initially created a pool of 26 items. A qualitative evaluation of the scale items was conducted by the researchers, during which each question was analyzed and discussed, resulting in the reduction of the number of items to 21. During the content validity process, 2 items were removed using the Lawshe technique, and 3 items were excluded during the exploratory factor analysis, finalizing the scale with 16 items. Participants from Izmir Democracy University's Dental Clinic were involved in the study. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were executed to affirm the scale's construct validity, and reliability was measured through Cronbach alpha. Statistical processing was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and JASP software. After rigorous item analysis and exploratory factor analyses across 2 testing rounds, a finalized version of the questionnaire emerged. A total of 193 individuals voluntarily participated in the study, with 56.67% being female. The participants had an average age of 29.53 years (min: 18, max: 65). Only individuals presenting to the university hospital dental clinic for cosmetic reasons were included in the study. The final version of the scale, comprising 16 items across 3 factors, demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. Factor analysis accounted for 53.72% of the variance, with the factors labeled as follows: "Impairment in Functionality," "Dental Appearance Satisfaction," and "Preoccupation." Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural integrity of the scale, and overall reliability, as indicated by a Cronbach alpha of 0.90, confirmed its consistency. The Dental Appearance Perception Scale is a reliable and valid tool with the potential to screen for BDD risks and enhance treatment satisfaction in dental settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000041637
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Dentofacial Appearance Perception Scale: Validity and reliability study

Osman Hasan Tahsin Kılıç, Duygu Kürklü Arpaçay, Aysel Başer
2 citations
Medicine
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
4.61
article

Development of the Dentofacial Appearance Perception Scale: Validity and reliability study

Osman Hasan Tahsin Kılıç, Duygu Kürklü Arpaçay, Aysel Başer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Concerns about the appearance of teeth and mouth, which play a key role in communication and first impressions, are natural to some extent. However, excessive concern over these areas should raise suspicion of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). The use of a validated and standardized screening tool in dental settings may improve the identification of BDD. This study aims to develop a validated tool to alert dentists to potential BDD cases among patients seeking cosmetic dental procedures. The research team conducted a literature review and initially created a pool of 26 items. A qualitative evaluation of the scale items was conducted by the researchers, during which each question was analyzed and discussed, resulting in the reduction of the number of items to 21. During the content validity process, 2 items were removed using the Lawshe technique, and 3 items were excluded during the exploratory factor analysis, finalizing the scale with 16 items. Participants from Izmir Democracy University's Dental Clinic were involved in the study. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were executed to affirm the scale's construct validity, and reliability was measured through Cronbach alpha. Statistical processing was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and JASP software. After rigorous item analysis and exploratory factor analyses across 2 testing rounds, a finalized version of the questionnaire emerged. A total of 193 individuals voluntarily participated in the study, with 56.67% being female. The participants had an average age of 29.53 years (min: 18, max: 65). Only individuals presenting to the university hospital dental clinic for cosmetic reasons were included in the study. The final version of the scale, comprising 16 items across 3 factors, demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. Factor analysis accounted for 53.72% of the variance, with the factors labeled as follows: "Impairment in Functionality," "Dental Appearance Satisfaction," and "Preoccupation." Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structural integrity of the scale, and overall reliability, as indicated by a Cronbach alpha of 0.90, confirmed its consistency. The Dental Appearance Perception Scale is a reliable and valid tool with the potential to screen for BDD risks and enhance treatment satisfaction in dental settings.

MedicineVol. 104(10)
Izmir University (TR), İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.