Cathepsins and their role in gynecological cancers: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

Prior studies have reported connections between cathepsins (CTS) and gynecological cancers; however, the exact causal links are yet to be fully understood. Leveraging publicly accessible genome-wide association study summary datasets, we performed a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) and multivariate MR (MVMR) analysis, with the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary approach. MR analysis demonstrated inverse associations between CTSB and cervical cancer (IVW: odds ratio [OR] = 0.9995, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9991-0.9999, P = .0418), CTSE and ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9197, 95% CI = 0.8505-0.9944, P = .0358), CTSZ and ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9449, 95% CI = 0.8938-0.9990, P = .0459), CTSE and high grade serous ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.8939, 95% CI = 0.8248-0.9689, P = .0063), and CTSZ and high grade serous ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9269, 95% CI = 0.8667-0.9913, P = .0268). A positive correlation was identified between CTSH and clear cell ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 1.1496, 95% CI = 1.0368-1.2745, P = .0081). Nevertheless, subsequent adjustment for the false discovery rate revealed that none of the P-values retained statistical significance (PFDR > 0.05). MVMR analysis results elucidated that CTSZ was inversely associated with cervical cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9988, 95% CI = 0.9981-0.9996, P = .0022). Moreover, a positive association was noted between CTSF and cervical cancer (IVW: OR = 1.0007, 95% CI = 1.0000-1.0014, P = .0364), and similarly, between CTSS and cervical cancer (IVW: OR = 1.0005, 95% CI = 1.0000-1.0011, P = .0490). CTSO exhibited a positive association with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (IVW: OR = 1.4405, 95% CI = 1.1864-1.7490, P < .001), and CTSH was positively associated with clear cell ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 1.1167, 95% CI = 1.0131-1.2310, P = .0263). The MVMR analysis findings reveal that CTSZ emerges as a protective element against cervical cancer, whereas CTSF and CTSS represent risk factors for this disease. CTSO stands out as a risk factor for non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, and CTSH acts as a risk factor for clear cell ovarian cancer. This study elucidates causative connections between CTS and gynecological cancers, providing innovative insights for diagnostic and therapeutic optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000041653
Primary Topic
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cathepsins and their role in gynecological cancers: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

Xiaoting Wu, Meng Qiu, Lingyi Sun, Xiuli Ma et al.
1 links
Medicine
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
article

Cathepsins and their role in gynecological cancers: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

Xiaoting Wu, Meng Qiu, Lingyi Sun, Xiuli Ma, Xiaoying Li
article en

Abstract

Prior studies have reported connections between cathepsins (CTS) and gynecological cancers; however, the exact causal links are yet to be fully understood. Leveraging publicly accessible genome-wide association study summary datasets, we performed a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) and multivariate MR (MVMR) analysis, with the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary approach. MR analysis demonstrated inverse associations between CTSB and cervical cancer (IVW: odds ratio [OR] = 0.9995, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9991-0.9999, P = .0418), CTSE and ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9197, 95% CI = 0.8505-0.9944, P = .0358), CTSZ and ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9449, 95% CI = 0.8938-0.9990, P = .0459), CTSE and high grade serous ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.8939, 95% CI = 0.8248-0.9689, P = .0063), and CTSZ and high grade serous ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9269, 95% CI = 0.8667-0.9913, P = .0268). A positive correlation was identified between CTSH and clear cell ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 1.1496, 95% CI = 1.0368-1.2745, P = .0081). Nevertheless, subsequent adjustment for the false discovery rate revealed that none of the P-values retained statistical significance (PFDR > 0.05). MVMR analysis results elucidated that CTSZ was inversely associated with cervical cancer (IVW: OR = 0.9988, 95% CI = 0.9981-0.9996, P = .0022). Moreover, a positive association was noted between CTSF and cervical cancer (IVW: OR = 1.0007, 95% CI = 1.0000-1.0014, P = .0364), and similarly, between CTSS and cervical cancer (IVW: OR = 1.0005, 95% CI = 1.0000-1.0011, P = .0490). CTSO exhibited a positive association with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (IVW: OR = 1.4405, 95% CI = 1.1864-1.7490, P < .001), and CTSH was positively associated with clear cell ovarian cancer (IVW: OR = 1.1167, 95% CI = 1.0131-1.2310, P = .0263). The MVMR analysis findings reveal that CTSZ emerges as a protective element against cervical cancer, whereas CTSF and CTSS represent risk factors for this disease. CTSO stands out as a risk factor for non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, and CTSH acts as a risk factor for clear cell ovarian cancer. This study elucidates causative connections between CTS and gynecological cancers, providing innovative insights for diagnostic and therapeutic optimization.

MedicineVol. 104(10)
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.