The performance of growing degree day models to predict spring phenology of herbaceous species depends on the species' temporal niche

Abstract The concept of growing degree days (GDDs) is commonly used to predict phenological events in plants, assuming that plants develop proportionally to the accumulated temperature. Two species‐specific parameters, T Base and t 0 (minimum temperature above which and start date when GDDs begin to accumulate), are considered for the calculation. However, species‐specific optimised thresholds of wild herbaceous species remain sparse, and therefore the reliability of the models is questionable. By employing several modelling approaches using phenological records of leaf unfolding and flowering onset of 87 wild herbaceous species collected in six European botanical gardens between 2019 and 2024, we assessed the reliability of GDD models across a diverse array of species. We further examined whether thresholds of T Base and t 0 for calculating GDD can be optimised for a large set of species and for single species. We aimed to estimate and evaluate these thresholds and the reliability of GDD models using species' temporal niche and bud traits to see whether for specific groups of species, specific GDD models work better. Our analyses revealed that GDD models for leaf unfolding and flowering onset performed better than the null model (i.e. mean date across years and species) for 84% and 70% of the species, respectively. Our results showed that species with intermediate temporal niches were less dependent on the selection of T Base and t 0 . Overall, we found better performance of the models using a T Base around 4°C for most of the species. By considering optimised thresholds, we found that predictions of leaf unfolding dates were more accurate in early‐growing species, and regarding the start date for temperature accumulation, we found that larger values for t 0 are suitable for predictions for species with later leaf unfolding or flowering onset. Our results emphasise that simple temperature accumulating GDD models can be optimised by using the temporal niches of the studied species to approximate the underlying model parameters or by applying thresholds that are valid for many species. The use of simple but optimised GDD models can be advantageous for small datasets that would otherwise be overfitted with more complex models. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70020
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The performance of growing degree day models to predict spring phenology of herbaceous species depends on the species' temporal niche

Yann Vitasse, Karin Mora, Birgit Nordt, Anja Linstädter et al.
6 citations
Functional Ecology
Species Distribution and Climate Change
11.03
article

The performance of growing degree day models to predict spring phenology of herbaceous species depends on the species' temporal niche

Yann Vitasse, Karin Mora, Birgit Nordt, Anja Linstädter, Barbara Knickmann, Christine Römermann, Robert Rauschkolb, Patrick Weigelt, Annette Menzel, Jens Kattge, Tomáš Herben
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The concept of growing degree days (GDDs) is commonly used to predict phenological events in plants, assuming that plants develop proportionally to the accumulated temperature. Two species‐specific parameters, T Base and t 0 (minimum temperature above which and start date when GDDs begin to accumulate), are considered for the calculation. However, species‐specific optimised thresholds of wild herbaceous species remain sparse, and therefore the reliability of the models is questionable. By employing several modelling approaches using phenological records of leaf unfolding and flowering onset of 87 wild herbaceous species collected in six European botanical gardens between 2019 and 2024, we assessed the reliability of GDD models across a diverse array of species. We further examined whether thresholds of T Base and t 0 for calculating GDD can be optimised for a large set of species and for single species. We aimed to estimate and evaluate these thresholds and the reliability of GDD models using species' temporal niche and bud traits to see whether for specific groups of species, specific GDD models work better. Our analyses revealed that GDD models for leaf unfolding and flowering onset performed better than the null model (i.e. mean date across years and species) for 84% and 70% of the species, respectively. Our results showed that species with intermediate temporal niches were less dependent on the selection of T Base and t 0 . Overall, we found better performance of the models using a T Base around 4°C for most of the species. By considering optimised thresholds, we found that predictions of leaf unfolding dates were more accurate in early‐growing species, and regarding the start date for temperature accumulation, we found that larger values for t 0 are suitable for predictions for species with later leaf unfolding or flowering onset. Our results emphasise that simple temperature accumulating GDD models can be optimised by using the temporal niches of the studied species to approximate the underlying model parameters or by applying thresholds that are valid for many species. The use of simple but optimised GDD models can be advantageous for small datasets that would otherwise be overfitted with more complex models. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional Ecology
University of Vienna (AT), University of Potsdam (DE), Charles University (CZ), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), Institute for Advanced Study (DE), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
11.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.