Dynamics of Public Administration Reform Processes: Contrasting Top‐Down Purity and Meso‐Level Managerial Bricolage Reform in New Zealand

ABSTRACT Although the results of paradigmatic change are a common focus of the literature, significantly less attention has been paid to the process through which public administration reform takes place. In particular, the role of meso‐level induced changes has only recently started to receive some attention, and not much is yet known about how collaborative systems at the managerial level affect pathways of administrative reform. Here we compare the two most significant periods of reform in New Zealand in the past 50 years. The 1988–1989 reforms were based on simple (arguably simplistic) assumptions, amenable to rapid and politically led top‐down reform. In contrast, the 2012–2020 reforms conceived of public administration as a complex social system suited to incremental managerially induced change that was mainly driven by the bureaucratic elite. Our article shows that collective leadership may result in extensive paradigmatic changes through endogenous feedback and meso‐level induced processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13948
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of Public Administration Reform Processes: Contrasting Top‐Down Purity and Meso‐Level Managerial Bricolage Reform in New Zealand

Rodney James Scott, Flávia Maria de Mattos Donadelli
2 citations
Public Administration Review
Social Policy and Reform Studies
17.04
article

Dynamics of Public Administration Reform Processes: Contrasting Top‐Down Purity and Meso‐Level Managerial Bricolage Reform in New Zealand

Rodney James Scott, Flávia Maria de Mattos Donadelli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the results of paradigmatic change are a common focus of the literature, significantly less attention has been paid to the process through which public administration reform takes place. In particular, the role of meso‐level induced changes has only recently started to receive some attention, and not much is yet known about how collaborative systems at the managerial level affect pathways of administrative reform. Here we compare the two most significant periods of reform in New Zealand in the past 50 years. The 1988–1989 reforms were based on simple (arguably simplistic) assumptions, amenable to rapid and politically led top‐down reform. In contrast, the 2012–2020 reforms conceived of public administration as a complex social system suited to incremental managerially induced change that was mainly driven by the bureaucratic elite. Our article shows that collective leadership may result in extensive paradigmatic changes through endogenous feedback and meso‐level induced processes.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(6)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), UNSW Canberra, Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamics of Public Administration Reform Processes: Contrasting Top‐Down Purity and Meso‐Level Managerial Bricolage Reform in New Zealand — Rodney James Scott, Flávia Maria de Mattos Donadelli · Public Administration Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS