Management implications of human livelihood strategies on Madagascar's coastal landscapes

Abstract The unsustainable harvest and consumption of wild animals destabilizes both wildlife populations and the human livelihoods that depend upon them. In coastal landscapes, the overexploitation of terrestrial resources can increase pressures on marine ecosystems, and vice versa. We explore populations' ability to mitigate hunting pressure by bolstering marine livelihood strategies, assessing whether Malagasy people (or aggregated households) (1) transfer harvest pressure and consumption from oceans to forests in times of lower fisheries yields and (2) habitually exploit both marine and terrestrial resources. We also evaluate the diversity of fishers' and hunters' methods used and species targeted, as reliance on a limited range of resources elevates sensitivity to perturbations in resource access and forces people to shift across rather than within livelihood strategies when experiencing scarcity. We present data on annual marine and terrestrial wildlife use in western Madagascar, where cyclic droughts and famines exert pressure on local populations, and people depend on wild food sources from adjacent mangrove and dry forests. In a study village outside Kirindy Mitea National Park, we surveyed and interviewed 369 individuals ( N = 89 households) and conducted 18 focus groups over 6 months (September 2018 to March 2019). We found that individual people tended to exclusively hunt or fish, and hunters pursued relatively few species with more specialized methods than fishers did. By distributing resource utilization across ecosystems, families likely increase household resilience. Therefore, conservation and alternative livelihood efforts will benefit from a regional‐scale, multi‐ecosystem approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management implications of human livelihood strategies on Madagascar's coastal landscapes

Ryan S. Rothman, Patricia P. Wright, Katheryn C. Twiss, Niaina Nirina Mahefa Andriamavosoloarisoa et al.
1 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Coastal and Marine Management
2.42
article

Management implications of human livelihood strategies on Madagascar's coastal landscapes

Ryan S. Rothman, Patricia P. Wright, Katheryn C. Twiss, Niaina Nirina Mahefa Andriamavosoloarisoa, J. Daniels, Mamy Yves Andrianantenaina, Katherine Jane Kling, Claire Surkis, Théofrico Alexander Razafindrahasy, Cortni Borgerson, Katharine E. T. Thompson, Jeanne Mathilde Randriamanetsy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The unsustainable harvest and consumption of wild animals destabilizes both wildlife populations and the human livelihoods that depend upon them. In coastal landscapes, the overexploitation of terrestrial resources can increase pressures on marine ecosystems, and vice versa. We explore populations' ability to mitigate hunting pressure by bolstering marine livelihood strategies, assessing whether Malagasy people (or aggregated households) (1) transfer harvest pressure and consumption from oceans to forests in times of lower fisheries yields and (2) habitually exploit both marine and terrestrial resources. We also evaluate the diversity of fishers' and hunters' methods used and species targeted, as reliance on a limited range of resources elevates sensitivity to perturbations in resource access and forces people to shift across rather than within livelihood strategies when experiencing scarcity. We present data on annual marine and terrestrial wildlife use in western Madagascar, where cyclic droughts and famines exert pressure on local populations, and people depend on wild food sources from adjacent mangrove and dry forests. In a study village outside Kirindy Mitea National Park, we surveyed and interviewed 369 individuals ( N = 89 households) and conducted 18 focus groups over 6 months (September 2018 to March 2019). We found that individual people tended to exclusively hunt or fish, and hunters pursued relatively few species with more specialized methods than fishers did. By distributing resource utilization across ecosystems, families likely increase household resilience. Therefore, conservation and alternative livelihood efforts will benefit from a regional‐scale, multi‐ecosystem approach.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Antananarivo (MG), Montclair State University (US), Institute Malgache De Recherches Appliquées (MG), Stony Brook University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Coastal and Marine Management
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.