Decoding the Spatiotemporal Complexities of the Permafrost Carbon Feedback With Multimodal Ensemble Learning

Abstract Complex nonlinear relationships exist between the permafrost thermal state, active layer thickness, and terrestrial carbon cycle dynamics. In Arctic and boreal Alaska, significant uncertainties characterize the spatiotemporal rate and magnitude of permafrost degradation and the permafrost carbon feedback, with increasing recognition of the importance of thawing mechanisms. The challenges of monitoring sub‐surface phenomena with remote sensing technology further complicate the issue. There is an urgent need to understand how and to what extent thawing permafrost destabilizes the carbon balance in Alaska and to characterize the feedback involved. In this research, we use our artificial intelligence‐driven model GeoCryoAI to quantify permafrost carbon dynamics in Alaska. The GeoCryoAI model uses a hybridized process‐constrained ensemble learning framework to simultaneously ingest, scale, and analyze in situ measurements, remote sensing observations, and process‐based modeling outputs with disparate spatiotemporal sampling and data densities. We evaluated prior naïve (a) persistence and (b) teacher forcing approaches relative to (c) time‐delayed GeoCryoAI simulations, yielding the following error metrics (RMSE) for active layer thickness (ALT), methane (CH 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), respectively: 1.997, 1.327, 1.007 cm [1963–2022]; 0.884, 0.715, 0.694 nmol CH 4 km −2 month −1 [1994–2022]; 1.906, 0.697, 0.213 µmol CO 2 km −2 month −1 [1994–2022]. Our approach overcomes traditional model inefficiencies and resolves spatiotemporal disparities. GeoCryoAI captures abrupt and persistent changes while introducing a novel methodology for assimilating contemporaneous information at various scales. We describe GeoCryoAI, the methodology, our results, and plans for future applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jh000402
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding the Spatiotemporal Complexities of the Permafrost Carbon Feedback With Multimodal Ensemble Learning

Jennifer D. Watts, Amanda Armstrong, Kimberley Miner, Bradley Gay et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Climate change and permafrost
article

Decoding the Spatiotemporal Complexities of the Permafrost Carbon Feedback With Multimodal Ensemble Learning

Jennifer D. Watts, Amanda Armstrong, Kimberley Miner, Bradley Gay, Neal J. Pastick, Charles E. Miller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Complex nonlinear relationships exist between the permafrost thermal state, active layer thickness, and terrestrial carbon cycle dynamics. In Arctic and boreal Alaska, significant uncertainties characterize the spatiotemporal rate and magnitude of permafrost degradation and the permafrost carbon feedback, with increasing recognition of the importance of thawing mechanisms. The challenges of monitoring sub‐surface phenomena with remote sensing technology further complicate the issue. There is an urgent need to understand how and to what extent thawing permafrost destabilizes the carbon balance in Alaska and to characterize the feedback involved. In this research, we use our artificial intelligence‐driven model GeoCryoAI to quantify permafrost carbon dynamics in Alaska. The GeoCryoAI model uses a hybridized process‐constrained ensemble learning framework to simultaneously ingest, scale, and analyze in situ measurements, remote sensing observations, and process‐based modeling outputs with disparate spatiotemporal sampling and data densities. We evaluated prior naïve (a) persistence and (b) teacher forcing approaches relative to (c) time‐delayed GeoCryoAI simulations, yielding the following error metrics (RMSE) for active layer thickness (ALT), methane (CH 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), respectively: 1.997, 1.327, 1.007 cm [1963–2022]; 0.884, 0.715, 0.694 nmol CH 4 km −2 month −1 [1994–2022]; 1.906, 0.697, 0.213 µmol CO 2 km −2 month −1 [1994–2022]. Our approach overcomes traditional model inefficiencies and resolves spatiotemporal disparities. GeoCryoAI captures abrupt and persistent changes while introducing a novel methodology for assimilating contemporaneous information at various scales. We describe GeoCryoAI, the methodology, our results, and plans for future applications.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 2(1)
United States Geological Survey (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Woodwell Climate Research Center (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Montana State University (US), Earth Resources Observation and Science Center
Oak Ridge Associated Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Climate change and permafrost
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.