The Cross‐Race Effect in Lineups Versus Showups

ABSTRACT A witness's ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects is reliably higher for same‐race than for cross‐race faces. We investigated the relative magnitude of this well‐established effect in lineups versus showups. Based on diagnostic feature‐detection theory, we hypothesized that the cross‐race effect (CRE) for showups would be larger than that for lineups. However, contrary to our predictions, a similarly strong CRE was observed for showups and lineups, and high‐confidence accuracy trended lower in the cross‐race condition regardless of presentation format (showup vs. lineup). These results may indicate that witnesses did not initially encode certain diagnostic features of cross‐race faces that might otherwise be put to good use in lineups. Moreover, the apparent failure of participants to adjust for the lower discriminability in the cross‐race situation when expressing confidence may indicate that they may not fully appreciate how much more difficult it is to identify faces of a different race.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70035
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cross‐Race Effect in Lineups Versus Showups

Shen‐Hsing Annabel Chen, Kyros J. Shen, John T. Wixted
1 links
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

The Cross‐Race Effect in Lineups Versus Showups

Shen‐Hsing Annabel Chen, Kyros J. Shen, John T. Wixted
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A witness's ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects is reliably higher for same‐race than for cross‐race faces. We investigated the relative magnitude of this well‐established effect in lineups versus showups. Based on diagnostic feature‐detection theory, we hypothesized that the cross‐race effect (CRE) for showups would be larger than that for lineups. However, contrary to our predictions, a similarly strong CRE was observed for showups and lineups, and high‐confidence accuracy trended lower in the cross‐race condition regardless of presentation format (showup vs. lineup). These results may indicate that witnesses did not initially encode certain diagnostic features of cross‐race faces that might otherwise be put to good use in lineups. Moreover, the apparent failure of participants to adjust for the lower discriminability in the cross‐race situation when expressing confidence may indicate that they may not fully appreciate how much more difficult it is to identify faces of a different race.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 39(2)
University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Cross‐Race Effect in Lineups Versus Showups — Shen‐Hsing Annabel Chen, Kyros J. Shen, et al. · Applied Cognitive Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS