Creeping bentgrass cultivar responses to simulated foliar shade

Abstract Creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera L.) is a popular turfgrass species used on golf courses. It is routinely grown on putting greens and tees that are surrounded by trees, which exposes bentgrass to shaded conditions and results in physiological changes in the plant that can reduce quality, playability, and performance. The objective of this study was to identify traits that may be associated with shade tolerance in creeping bentgrass and identify cultivar responses to simulated foliar shade versus non‐shaded conditions. Greenhouse and growth chamber studies were utilized to evaluate 41 commercial cultivars and experimental selections arranged in a completely random design with four replications. Simulated shade was provided by a photoselective filter to reduce the red to far‐red ratio (R:FR) by ∼33% (R:FR ∼0.86) and decrease the light intensity by ∼50% compared to non‐shaded conditions. Traits measured were plant height, tiller count, height to tiller ratio, biomass, chlorophyll content, and turf quality ratings. Digital images were also collected. Plant height and chlorophyll content were significantly affected by light condition, and differences in these traits were observed among creeping bentgrass cultivars across the four experiments. Cultivars with a small percent change in height in simulated shade compared to no shade were L93XD, 007XL, Piranha, and Oakley. Cultivars with a large change in height under shade (higher under shade) were PennA4, Tyee, and PinUp. These cultivars would not be recommended for shaded sites. Cultivars with large increased changes in chlorophyll content were Matchplay and MacDonald, whereas the cultivar PennA4 and the experimental selection LPD15 had little change in chlorophyll concentration between shade and non‐shaded conditions. Principal component analysis revealed that turf quality under shade is associated with moderate increases in tiller number and chlorophyll content and smaller changes in plant heights. Cultivars that possess these traits, such as L93XD, 007XL, and Chinook, would be good choices for shaded environments. This research identified significant variation in cultivar response to simulated foliar shade and indicated that cultivar choice should be considered when planting in shaded environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Turfgrass Society research journal
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/its2.70012
Primary Topic
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creeping bentgrass cultivar responses to simulated foliar shade

E.A. MacPherson, Shuping Wu, Stacy A. Bonos
International Turfgrass Society research journal
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
article

Creeping bentgrass cultivar responses to simulated foliar shade

E.A. MacPherson, Shuping Wu, Stacy A. Bonos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera L.) is a popular turfgrass species used on golf courses. It is routinely grown on putting greens and tees that are surrounded by trees, which exposes bentgrass to shaded conditions and results in physiological changes in the plant that can reduce quality, playability, and performance. The objective of this study was to identify traits that may be associated with shade tolerance in creeping bentgrass and identify cultivar responses to simulated foliar shade versus non‐shaded conditions. Greenhouse and growth chamber studies were utilized to evaluate 41 commercial cultivars and experimental selections arranged in a completely random design with four replications. Simulated shade was provided by a photoselective filter to reduce the red to far‐red ratio (R:FR) by ∼33% (R:FR ∼0.86) and decrease the light intensity by ∼50% compared to non‐shaded conditions. Traits measured were plant height, tiller count, height to tiller ratio, biomass, chlorophyll content, and turf quality ratings. Digital images were also collected. Plant height and chlorophyll content were significantly affected by light condition, and differences in these traits were observed among creeping bentgrass cultivars across the four experiments. Cultivars with a small percent change in height in simulated shade compared to no shade were L93XD, 007XL, Piranha, and Oakley. Cultivars with a large change in height under shade (higher under shade) were PennA4, Tyee, and PinUp. These cultivars would not be recommended for shaded sites. Cultivars with large increased changes in chlorophyll content were Matchplay and MacDonald, whereas the cultivar PennA4 and the experimental selection LPD15 had little change in chlorophyll concentration between shade and non‐shaded conditions. Principal component analysis revealed that turf quality under shade is associated with moderate increases in tiller number and chlorophyll content and smaller changes in plant heights. Cultivars that possess these traits, such as L93XD, 007XL, and Chinook, would be good choices for shaded environments. This research identified significant variation in cultivar response to simulated foliar shade and indicated that cultivar choice should be considered when planting in shaded environments.

International Turfgrass Society research journalVol. 15(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
United States Golf Association, GCSAA Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.