“Armed conflict causes long-lasting environmental harms”

Armed conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza are very visible reminders of the severe negative impacts that armed conflicts have on the environment. Yet, despite knowledge of singular environmental issues and specific country contexts, the magnitude, temporal, and multiscalar impact of armed conflict on broader environmental performance has not been quantified. This knowledge gap limits the ability to design broad and targeted measures of environmental protection during armed conflict as well as rehabilitation in the post-conflict period. Here, we conduct the first global study on the environmental impacts of armed conflict. Our analysis shows that countries with an armed conflict have a significantly worse environmental performance. Armed conflict length and severity are both negatively affecting the environmental performance of countries. Even after an armed conflict ends, countries need about 20 to 30 years to recover in terms of environmental performance. This finding is particularly concerning when considering the risk of conflict recurrence due to environmental stress and bad natural resource management. Taken together, this demonstrates the urgency of measures to protect the environment during armed conflicts and in post-conflict settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Security
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796251323739
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Armed conflict causes long-lasting environmental harms”

Tobias Ide, Florian Krampe, Joakim Kreutz
5 citations
Environment and Security
Transboundary Water Resource Management
21.01
article

“Armed conflict causes long-lasting environmental harms”

Tobias Ide, Florian Krampe, Joakim Kreutz
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Armed conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza are very visible reminders of the severe negative impacts that armed conflicts have on the environment. Yet, despite knowledge of singular environmental issues and specific country contexts, the magnitude, temporal, and multiscalar impact of armed conflict on broader environmental performance has not been quantified. This knowledge gap limits the ability to design broad and targeted measures of environmental protection during armed conflict as well as rehabilitation in the post-conflict period. Here, we conduct the first global study on the environmental impacts of armed conflict. Our analysis shows that countries with an armed conflict have a significantly worse environmental performance. Armed conflict length and severity are both negatively affecting the environmental performance of countries. Even after an armed conflict ends, countries need about 20 to 30 years to recover in terms of environmental performance. This finding is particularly concerning when considering the risk of conflict recurrence due to environmental stress and bad natural resource management. Taken together, this demonstrates the urgency of measures to protect the environment during armed conflicts and in post-conflict settings.

Environment and SecurityVol. 4(1)
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SE), Hiroshima University (JP), Uppsala University (SE), Murdoch University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.