Gas transfer velocity (k600) increases with discharge in steep streams but not in low‐slope streams

Abstract Gas transfer velocity () controls gas fluxes between aquatic ecosystems and the atmosphere. In streams, is controlled by turbulence and, thus, local hydrology and geomorphology. Resultantly, variability in can be large and modeling from physical parameters can have large uncertainty. Here, we leverage a large dataset of estimates derived from tracer‐gas experiments in 22 US streams across a range of discharges. Our analysis shows that was highly variable both spatially across and temporally within streams, with estimates of spanning three orders of magnitude. Overall, scaled with discharge in steep streams due to relatively high stream power, but not in low‐slope streams, where stream power was relatively low even at high flows. Understanding how responds to stream discharge in a wide variety of streams is key to creating temporally and spatially resolved estimates of biogeochemical processes in streams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography Letters
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.70003
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gas transfer velocity (k600) increases with discharge in steep streams but not in low‐slope streams

Kaelin M. Cawley, Walter K. Dodds, Robert T. Hensley, Nicolas Harrison et al.
4 citations
Limnology and Oceanography Letters
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
3.27
article

Gas transfer velocity (k600) increases with discharge in steep streams but not in low‐slope streams

Kaelin M. Cawley, Walter K. Dodds, Robert T. Hensley, Nicolas Harrison, Kelly S. Aho, Keli J. Goodman, Robert O. Hall
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Gas transfer velocity () controls gas fluxes between aquatic ecosystems and the atmosphere. In streams, is controlled by turbulence and, thus, local hydrology and geomorphology. Resultantly, variability in can be large and modeling from physical parameters can have large uncertainty. Here, we leverage a large dataset of estimates derived from tracer‐gas experiments in 22 US streams across a range of discharges. Our analysis shows that was highly variable both spatially across and temporally within streams, with estimates of spanning three orders of magnitude. Overall, scaled with discharge in steep streams due to relatively high stream power, but not in low‐slope streams, where stream power was relatively low even at high flows. Understanding how responds to stream discharge in a wide variety of streams is key to creating temporally and spatially resolved estimates of biogeochemical processes in streams.

Limnology and Oceanography LettersVol. 10(3)
Kansas State University (US), National Ecological Observatory Network (US), University of Montana (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Battelle
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gas transfer velocity (k600) increases with discharge in steep streams but not in low‐slope streams — Kaelin M. Cawley, Walter K. Dodds, et al. · Limnology and Oceanography Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS