‘This is Unacceptable in Europe in the 21st Century’: Time, Place and European Identity in the 2013–14 Russia–Ukraine Crisis

Abstract The 2013–2014 Russia–Ukraine crisis that started the Russian war against Ukraine is usually conceptualised as a geopolitical or international security crisis and analysed according to spatial logics. This article focuses on the underresearched chronopolitics of the crisis, arguing that in addition to a security crisis, events presented European leaders with a temporal identity crisis. The very fact that something like this could happen ‘in Europe in the 21st century’ was deemed extraordinary, challenging the EU's core legitimating narrative of Europe as a peaceful and advanced space. Drawing on timing theory from International Relations, the article analyses the frequent use of temporal language in political discourse during the crisis, such as the oft‐repeated phrase that Russia's actions were ‘unacceptable (in Europe) in the 21st century’. It casts leaders as timing agents seeking to fit events into their respective timing projects to legitimise their own actions and discredit those of others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13725
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘This is Unacceptable in Europe in the 21st Century’: Time, Place and European Identity in the 2013–14 Russia–Ukraine Crisis

Adrian Rogstad
1 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
4.20
article

‘This is Unacceptable in Europe in the 21st Century’: Time, Place and European Identity in the 2013–14 Russia–Ukraine Crisis

Adrian Rogstad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 2013–2014 Russia–Ukraine crisis that started the Russian war against Ukraine is usually conceptualised as a geopolitical or international security crisis and analysed according to spatial logics. This article focuses on the underresearched chronopolitics of the crisis, arguing that in addition to a security crisis, events presented European leaders with a temporal identity crisis. The very fact that something like this could happen ‘in Europe in the 21st century’ was deemed extraordinary, challenging the EU's core legitimating narrative of Europe as a peaceful and advanced space. Drawing on timing theory from International Relations, the article analyses the frequent use of temporal language in political discourse during the crisis, such as the oft‐repeated phrase that Russia's actions were ‘unacceptable (in Europe) in the 21st century’. It casts leaders as timing agents seeking to fit events into their respective timing projects to legitimise their own actions and discredit those of others.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 63(6)
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘This is Unacceptable in Europe in the 21st Century’: Time, Place and European Identity in the 2013–14 Russia–Ukraine Crisis — Adrian Rogstad · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS