Beyond ‘Fit for 55’: The emergence of the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle in EU law and EU funding mechanisms

Abstract This contribution aims to define the emerging principle of ‘Do no significant harm’ (DNSH) in EU law, using the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) of the European plan to tackle the socio‐ economic consequences of the pandemic, as a case study. There has been a proliferation of the DNSH principle in EU policies, documents and EU legal acts. However, at the current stage, there is a gap in the literature concerning the role of the DNSH in the EU legal framework. The RRF applies the principle of DNSH as defined in the Taxonomy Regulation and deploys it as an eligibility criterion for the disbursement of EU funding. Thus, the DNSH shapes Member States' actions by prioritising environmental objectives. By looking at concrete examples, this contribution argues that streamlining the principle DNSH ensures policy coherence with the 2030 EU's decarbonisation target, beyond the ‘Fit for 55’ Package.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12603
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond ‘Fit for 55’: The emergence of the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle in EU law and EU funding mechanisms

Rosalba Famà
3 citations
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Taxation and Legal Issues
11.73
article

Beyond ‘Fit for 55’: The emergence of the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle in EU law and EU funding mechanisms

Rosalba Famà
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This contribution aims to define the emerging principle of ‘Do no significant harm’ (DNSH) in EU law, using the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) of the European plan to tackle the socio‐ economic consequences of the pandemic, as a case study. There has been a proliferation of the DNSH principle in EU policies, documents and EU legal acts. However, at the current stage, there is a gap in the literature concerning the role of the DNSH in the EU legal framework. The RRF applies the principle of DNSH as defined in the Taxonomy Regulation and deploys it as an eligibility criterion for the disbursement of EU funding. Thus, the DNSH shapes Member States' actions by prioritising environmental objectives. By looking at concrete examples, this contribution argues that streamlining the principle DNSH ensures policy coherence with the 2030 EU's decarbonisation target, beyond the ‘Fit for 55’ Package.

Review of European Comparative & International Environmental LawVol. 34(1)
Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Taxation and Legal Issues
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond ‘Fit for 55’: The emergence of the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle in EU law and EU funding mechanisms — Rosalba Famà · Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS