Domestic Misfits, Social Physics and the Problem of International Statistical Standardization

ABSTRACT During the 19th century, driven by the ideas of Adolphe Quetelet, population statistics were actively being developed and debated by many nascent nation‐states. The International Statistical Institute (ISI) was one of the premier statistical organizations of the 19th and 20th centuries that possessed a very international and prestigious membership including representatives from across Europe, Latin America and Japan. During this “first principles” period, statisticians were openly grappling with both the practical questions related to the “conditions of production” of data as well as questions of statistical theory and good practice. This article analyzes some of the debate the ISI held on the problem of international social statistical category standardization that the ISI encountered as well as the factors and “tests” they used to resolve these issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology Lens
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12492
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domestic Misfits, Social Physics and the Problem of International Statistical Standardization

Kathryn Barber
Sociology Lens
Census and Population Estimation
article

Domestic Misfits, Social Physics and the Problem of International Statistical Standardization

Kathryn Barber
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT During the 19th century, driven by the ideas of Adolphe Quetelet, population statistics were actively being developed and debated by many nascent nation‐states. The International Statistical Institute (ISI) was one of the premier statistical organizations of the 19th and 20th centuries that possessed a very international and prestigious membership including representatives from across Europe, Latin America and Japan. During this “first principles” period, statisticians were openly grappling with both the practical questions related to the “conditions of production” of data as well as questions of statistical theory and good practice. This article analyzes some of the debate the ISI held on the problem of international social statistical category standardization that the ISI encountered as well as the factors and “tests” they used to resolve these issues.

Sociology LensVol. 38(2)
Cape Breton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.