Divergent Responses of CH<sub>4</sub> Emissions and Uptake to Global Change Drivers

Abstract Global changes strongly affect methane (CH 4 ) emissions and uptake. However, it is unclear how CH 4 emissions and uptake across rice paddy fields, uplands, and natural wetlands are affected by global change drivers, including nitrogen (N) addition, elevated carbon dioxide (eCO 2 ), warming (W), and precipitation (P). Here, we collected 1,250 observations of manipulated experiments from 303 publications during 1980–2020, encompassing 1,154 observations of single‐factor experiments and 96 observations of two‐paired experiments, and analyzed the effects of global change drivers on CH 4 emissions and uptake. Results showed CH 4 emissions were stimulated by eCO 2 , W, and increased P (IP). CH 4 uptake was inhibited by N and IP but significantly enhanced by W and decreased P. The combined effects of the four global change drivers significantly inhibited CH 4 uptake (−9[−12, −6] %) and stimulated CH 4 emissions (13[7, 19] %). Two‐factor interactions significantly reduced CH 4 emissions (−15[−27, −1] %) and insignificantly reduced uptake (−10[−19, 0] %). The interactive effects of any two global change drivers were mostly antagonistic. Random forest analysis indicated that the important factors affecting the responses of CH 4 emissions or uptake to different global change drivers varied. The structural equation model confirmed that climate, soil properties, and wetness index consistently played a remarkable role in regulating the responses of CH 4 emissions and uptake to global change drivers. This synthesis highlights an urgent need to consider the individual and interactive effects of multiple global change drivers on CH 4 emissions and uptake for a better understanding of the methane‐climate feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gb008183
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergent Responses of CH4 Emissions and Uptake to Global Change Drivers

Jing M. Chen, Weimin Ju, Yanlian Zhou, Rui Xie et al.
3 citations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
3.32
article

Divergent Responses of CH4 Emissions and Uptake to Global Change Drivers

Jing M. Chen, Weimin Ju, Yanlian Zhou, Rui Xie, Yu Mao, Ran Yan, Tingting Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Global changes strongly affect methane (CH 4 ) emissions and uptake. However, it is unclear how CH 4 emissions and uptake across rice paddy fields, uplands, and natural wetlands are affected by global change drivers, including nitrogen (N) addition, elevated carbon dioxide (eCO 2 ), warming (W), and precipitation (P). Here, we collected 1,250 observations of manipulated experiments from 303 publications during 1980–2020, encompassing 1,154 observations of single‐factor experiments and 96 observations of two‐paired experiments, and analyzed the effects of global change drivers on CH 4 emissions and uptake. Results showed CH 4 emissions were stimulated by eCO 2 , W, and increased P (IP). CH 4 uptake was inhibited by N and IP but significantly enhanced by W and decreased P. The combined effects of the four global change drivers significantly inhibited CH 4 uptake (−9[−12, −6] %) and stimulated CH 4 emissions (13[7, 19] %). Two‐factor interactions significantly reduced CH 4 emissions (−15[−27, −1] %) and insignificantly reduced uptake (−10[−19, 0] %). The interactive effects of any two global change drivers were mostly antagonistic. Random forest analysis indicated that the important factors affecting the responses of CH 4 emissions or uptake to different global change drivers varied. The structural equation model confirmed that climate, soil properties, and wetness index consistently played a remarkable role in regulating the responses of CH 4 emissions and uptake to global change drivers. This synthesis highlights an urgent need to consider the individual and interactive effects of multiple global change drivers on CH 4 emissions and uptake for a better understanding of the methane‐climate feedback.

Global Biogeochemical CyclesVol. 39(3)
University of Toronto (CA), Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.