Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the <scp>ILO</scp> and <scp>OECD</scp>

ABSTRACT The emergence of governance by numbers (GBN) has seen the increasing use of metrics to influence government and corporate behaviour, but its uptake varies significantly across international organisations. This study examines the adoption of GBN in global labour governance at the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD). Using a comparative institutional approach, we highlight the ILO's resistance to developing indicators of decent work and economic performance, despite support from the labour movement. Conversely, the OECD has fully embraced GBN through labour market performance measurements, which makes some of its normative proposals less visible due to their qualitative nature. We conclude that the adoption of GBN is not inevitable and depends on the organisational cultures and structures of international organisations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70002
Primary Topic
International Labor and Employment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the ILO and OECD

Vicente Silva, John Berten, Huw Thomas
Global Policy
International Labor and Employment Law
article

Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the ILO and OECD

Vicente Silva, John Berten, Huw Thomas
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The emergence of governance by numbers (GBN) has seen the increasing use of metrics to influence government and corporate behaviour, but its uptake varies significantly across international organisations. This study examines the adoption of GBN in global labour governance at the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD). Using a comparative institutional approach, we highlight the ILO's resistance to developing indicators of decent work and economic performance, despite support from the labour movement. Conversely, the OECD has fully embraced GBN through labour market performance measurements, which makes some of its normative proposals less visible due to their qualitative nature. We conclude that the adoption of GBN is not inevitable and depends on the organisational cultures and structures of international organisations.

Global PolicyVol. 16(2)
University College Dublin (IE), Bielefeld University (DE), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
International Labor and Employment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the <scp>ILO</scp> and <scp>OECD</scp> — Vicente Silva, John Berten, et al. · Global Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS