Polysemy and roots: Deep versus shallow fetching

The paper argues for a model of polysemy based on the blueprint offered by Paul Pietroski whereby the meaning of a lexical item is an instruction to fetch a concept from an address. We show that the bare idea of fetching admits of a deep construal, where a concept is fetched, and a shallow construal, where the instruction merely links a lexical item to an address without automatically retrieving anything from the address; retrieval only occurs when the item is embedded within a syntactic structure. We offer considerations in favour of the shallow construal, which is consistent with a root conception of lexical items.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mind & Language
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12539
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polysemy and roots: Deep versus shallow fetching

Tamara Dobler, John Collins
4 citations
Mind & Language
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
12.11
article

Polysemy and roots: Deep versus shallow fetching

Tamara Dobler, John Collins
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The paper argues for a model of polysemy based on the blueprint offered by Paul Pietroski whereby the meaning of a lexical item is an instruction to fetch a concept from an address. We show that the bare idea of fetching admits of a deep construal, where a concept is fetched, and a shallow construal, where the instruction merely links a lexical item to an address without automatically retrieving anything from the address; retrieval only occurs when the item is embedded within a syntactic structure. We offer considerations in favour of the shallow construal, which is consistent with a root conception of lexical items.

Mind & LanguageVol. 40(5)
Ikerbasque (ES), University of the Basque Country (ES), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Leverhulme Trust, Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.