Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human‐centered design

Abstract Guidelines International Network North America expanded on ‘Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age’, an initiative to innovate guideline development and implementation leveraging technology. The objective: solve pain points ̶ problems occurring at different levels of the customer experience ̶ in guideline development and implementation using human‐centered design (HCD). In HCD, customers are people who would use the product or system being designed and are at the center of the design process. HCD builds empathy to understand challenges facing different customers. HCD has three phases: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. Inspiration phase : Semi‐structured interviews collected multiple perspectives within guideline development and implementation and determined key pain points (38 participants). Ideation phase : HCD workshop ‘Bringing Guidelines to the Digital Age’ defined design goals, determined design criteria, and developed ‘prototype’ solutions for each pain point with feasibility testing during the workshop (35 participants). Implementation phase : Postworkshop participants continued developing and testing solution designs, tracked progress, and created products to be further tested, iterated, or published (44 participants). Interviews revealed five pain points in implementation stemming from issues in guideline development: (1) lack of clarity of ‘how’ to apply recommendations; (2) inadequate or nonexistent feedback and testing; (3) unclear language; (4) incomplete information; and (5) lack of informatics expertise. Each workshop group produced prototypes – early models of products built to test a concept or process – that were consolidated into five solution categories and refined through post‐workshop teams focusing on: (1) patient preferences in recommendations (2) real‐world testing and feedback, (3) standard operating procedures for computability and better implementability, (4) artificial intelligence approaches, and (5) connecting informatics with guideline development. HCD provided a user‐centered, iterative approach to design solutions leveraging technology to solve paint points and improve implementation of guidelines into patient care. This is a blueprint for using HCD in guideline development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gin2.70014
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human‐centered design

Maria Michaels, Chirine Chehab, Mindy Hangsleben
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human‐centered design

Maria Michaels, Chirine Chehab, Mindy Hangsleben
article en

Abstract

Abstract Guidelines International Network North America expanded on ‘Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age’, an initiative to innovate guideline development and implementation leveraging technology. The objective: solve pain points ̶ problems occurring at different levels of the customer experience ̶ in guideline development and implementation using human‐centered design (HCD). In HCD, customers are people who would use the product or system being designed and are at the center of the design process. HCD builds empathy to understand challenges facing different customers. HCD has three phases: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. Inspiration phase : Semi‐structured interviews collected multiple perspectives within guideline development and implementation and determined key pain points (38 participants). Ideation phase : HCD workshop ‘Bringing Guidelines to the Digital Age’ defined design goals, determined design criteria, and developed ‘prototype’ solutions for each pain point with feasibility testing during the workshop (35 participants). Implementation phase : Postworkshop participants continued developing and testing solution designs, tracked progress, and created products to be further tested, iterated, or published (44 participants). Interviews revealed five pain points in implementation stemming from issues in guideline development: (1) lack of clarity of ‘how’ to apply recommendations; (2) inadequate or nonexistent feedback and testing; (3) unclear language; (4) incomplete information; and (5) lack of informatics expertise. Each workshop group produced prototypes – early models of products built to test a concept or process – that were consolidated into five solution categories and refined through post‐workshop teams focusing on: (1) patient preferences in recommendations (2) real‐world testing and feedback, (3) standard operating procedures for computability and better implementability, (4) artificial intelligence approaches, and (5) connecting informatics with guideline development. HCD provided a user‐centered, iterative approach to design solutions leveraging technology to solve paint points and improve implementation of guidelines into patient care. This is a blueprint for using HCD in guideline development.

Clinical and Public Health GuidelinesVol. 2(2)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (US), ET International (United States) (US), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.