Sensitivity analysis with a 3D mixed‐dimensional code for direct current geoelectrical investigations of landfills: synthetic tests

Abstract Electrical resistivity tomography is a suitable technique for non‐invasive monitoring of municipal solid waste landfills, but accurate sensitivity analysis is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of geoelectrical investigations and to properly design data acquisition. Typically, a thin high‐resistivity membrane is placed underneath the waste to prevent leakage of leachate. In the construction of a numerical framework for sensitivity computation, taking into account the actual dimensions of the electrodes and, in particular, of the membrane, can lead to extremely high computational costs. In this work, we present a novel approach for numerically computing sensitivity effectively by adopting a mixed‐dimensional framework, where the membrane is approximated as a two‐dimensional object and the electrodes as one‐dimensional objects. The code is first validated against analytical expressions for simple four‐electrode arrays and a homogeneous medium. Then it is tested in simplified landfill models, where a two‐dimensional box‐shaped liner separates the landfill body from the surrounding media, and 48 electrodes are used. The results show that electrodes arranged linearly along both sides of the perimeter edges of the box‐shaped liner are promising for detecting liner damage, with sensitivity increasing by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude, even for damage as small as one‐sixth of the electrode spacing in diameter. Good results are also obtained when simulating an electrical connection between the landfill and the surrounding media that is not due to liner damage. The configurations with the highest sensitivity directly beneath the liner are quadrupoles in which both the current and voltage dipoles have one electrode inside the liner and one electrode outside, and a two‐dimensional arrangement of the electrodes. The modelled sensitivity values beneath the liner are close to a minimum sensitivity threshold derived from arbitrary and simplified assumptions. We believe that direct current surveys have the potential to detect liner damage using electrode spreads positioned along the liner perimeter, both inside and outside the landfill. However, down‐scaled laboratory tests will be necessary to validate the modelling results and confirm whether the computed sensitivity values are sufficiently high to reliably detect liner damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity analysis with a 3D mixed‐dimensional code for direct current geoelectrical investigations of landfills: synthetic tests

Laura Longoni, Lorenzo Panzeri, Monica Papini, Diego Arosio et al.
1 citations
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
1.87
article

Sensitivity analysis with a 3D mixed‐dimensional code for direct current geoelectrical investigations of landfills: synthetic tests

Laura Longoni, Lorenzo Panzeri, Monica Papini, Diego Arosio, Alessio Fumagalli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Electrical resistivity tomography is a suitable technique for non‐invasive monitoring of municipal solid waste landfills, but accurate sensitivity analysis is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of geoelectrical investigations and to properly design data acquisition. Typically, a thin high‐resistivity membrane is placed underneath the waste to prevent leakage of leachate. In the construction of a numerical framework for sensitivity computation, taking into account the actual dimensions of the electrodes and, in particular, of the membrane, can lead to extremely high computational costs. In this work, we present a novel approach for numerically computing sensitivity effectively by adopting a mixed‐dimensional framework, where the membrane is approximated as a two‐dimensional object and the electrodes as one‐dimensional objects. The code is first validated against analytical expressions for simple four‐electrode arrays and a homogeneous medium. Then it is tested in simplified landfill models, where a two‐dimensional box‐shaped liner separates the landfill body from the surrounding media, and 48 electrodes are used. The results show that electrodes arranged linearly along both sides of the perimeter edges of the box‐shaped liner are promising for detecting liner damage, with sensitivity increasing by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude, even for damage as small as one‐sixth of the electrode spacing in diameter. Good results are also obtained when simulating an electrical connection between the landfill and the surrounding media that is not due to liner damage. The configurations with the highest sensitivity directly beneath the liner are quadrupoles in which both the current and voltage dipoles have one electrode inside the liner and one electrode outside, and a two‐dimensional arrangement of the electrodes. The modelled sensitivity values beneath the liner are close to a minimum sensitivity threshold derived from arbitrary and simplified assumptions. We believe that direct current surveys have the potential to detect liner damage using electrode spreads positioned along the liner perimeter, both inside and outside the landfill. However, down‐scaled laboratory tests will be necessary to validate the modelling results and confirm whether the computed sensitivity values are sufficiently high to reliably detect liner damage.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 73(4)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.