Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fault Diagnosis in PV Systems

This study proposes a methodology for performance evaluation of fault diagnosis in photovoltaic (PV) systems using machine learning techniques, including Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), and Naive Bayes. Actual data were acquired from a 3kW PV testbed and categorized into eight classes representing normal and significant fault conditions. For each class, a confusion matrix and corresponding relevant metrics are utilized to conduct class-specific performance assessments. The results indicate that the Random Forest model outperforms other models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. It demonstrates outstanding performance for normal conditions (Class 0 and Class 7) and maintains stable performance for major fault types (Class 1 and Class 6). While the kNN model delivers acceptable performance for Class 0, it shows limitations for certain fault types. The Naive Bayes model exhibits the lowest performance and faces significant challenges in accurately handling most fault types.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5207/jieie.2025.39.1.44
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fault Diagnosis in PV Systems

Herie Park, Jong-Gyu Hwang, Young J. Oh, Bo Kyung Kang
Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
article

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fault Diagnosis in PV Systems

Herie Park, Jong-Gyu Hwang, Young J. Oh, Bo Kyung Kang
article en

Abstract

This study proposes a methodology for performance evaluation of fault diagnosis in photovoltaic (PV) systems using machine learning techniques, including Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), and Naive Bayes. Actual data were acquired from a 3kW PV testbed and categorized into eight classes representing normal and significant fault conditions. For each class, a confusion matrix and corresponding relevant metrics are utilized to conduct class-specific performance assessments. The results indicate that the Random Forest model outperforms other models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. It demonstrates outstanding performance for normal conditions (Class 0 and Class 7) and maintains stable performance for major fault types (Class 1 and Class 6). While the kNN model delivers acceptable performance for Class 0, it shows limitations for certain fault types. The Naive Bayes model exhibits the lowest performance and faces significant challenges in accurately handling most fault types.

Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation EngineersVol. 39(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.