Intersectional Inequality in Education in Africa, Asia, and the Americas

ABSTRACT Intersectional inequality—the notion that disparities run along combinations of social groups such as gender or ethnicity—has become an increasingly prominent concept in social sciences. However, there is little empirical research using an intersectional framework to measure inequality. We propose two metrics of intersectional inequality based on the concept of horizontal inequality. Applying these measures, we analyze educational intersectionality in gender and ethnicity using data from 40 countries. We show that the intersectional perspective reveals particularly disadvantaged groups that remain masked if gender and ethnic inequality are analyzed separately. In several countries, the most disadvantaged intersectional group is of a different gender or ethnicity than the generally more disadvantaged gender or ethnicity. Moreover, in most countries intersectional inequality is greater than the sum of gender and ethnic inequality. In these countries, neither increasing education levels nor reducing gender and ethnic inequalities is sufficient to “leave no one behind.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional Inequality in Education in Africa, Asia, and the Americas

Isabel Günther, Kenneth Harttgen, Dario Meili
1 citations
Review of Income and Wealth
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
2.37
article

Intersectional Inequality in Education in Africa, Asia, and the Americas

Isabel Günther, Kenneth Harttgen, Dario Meili
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Intersectional inequality—the notion that disparities run along combinations of social groups such as gender or ethnicity—has become an increasingly prominent concept in social sciences. However, there is little empirical research using an intersectional framework to measure inequality. We propose two metrics of intersectional inequality based on the concept of horizontal inequality. Applying these measures, we analyze educational intersectionality in gender and ethnicity using data from 40 countries. We show that the intersectional perspective reveals particularly disadvantaged groups that remain masked if gender and ethnic inequality are analyzed separately. In several countries, the most disadvantaged intersectional group is of a different gender or ethnicity than the generally more disadvantaged gender or ethnicity. Moreover, in most countries intersectional inequality is greater than the sum of gender and ethnic inequality. In these countries, neither increasing education levels nor reducing gender and ethnic inequalities is sufficient to “leave no one behind.”

Review of Income and WealthVol. 71(2)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.