Improving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Sara Schroter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-8564)
Melissa L. Rethlefsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-9368)
Improving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial
Sara Schroter, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Whitney Townsend, L.M. Bouter et al.
Citations
2 citations
Journal
BMJ evidence-based medicine
Topics
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI)
1.40
article
Improving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial
Sara Schroter, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Whitney Townsend, L.M. Bouter, Holly K. Grossetta Nardini, Maurice Petrus Zeegers, Jamie J Kirkham, David Moher, David Blanco, Kate Nyhan, Ana Patricia Ayala, Shona Kirtley, Tara Brigham
article en
2 citations
Abstract
No abstract available for this paper.
Publication Tag
BMJ evidence-based medicineVol. 30(4)
Institutions
University of New Mexico (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Michigan (US), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), WinnMed (US), University of Manchester (GB), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES), Yale University (US), Maastricht University (NL), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), A. Alfred Taubman Health Care Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)